Fall Creek Farm and Nursery, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Fall ranks #12,005 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #12,005
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 5th percentile
- by Innovation Score (18.5/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- -8%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R12005 · US Corporation #12,005 · 25 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-SMALL 25 grants
- UPPER-Q #12,005/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH FaceTec
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-LOW 18.5/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-FLAT -8% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: FaceTec, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Fall’s 18.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Fall
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Midnight Madness… · near 19
Midnight Madness… · near
19 score
- Anhui Inno-Sign… · near 19
Anhui Inno-Sign… · near
19 score
- Fall Creek Farm and… · this assignee 19
Fall Creek Farm and… · this assignee
19 score
- Viking Solutions · near 19
Viking Solutions · near
19 score
- Sorel · near 18
Sorel · near
18 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Fall's Innovation Score is 18.5/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Fall?
Each dot is one of Fall’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Fall’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 11.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Fall's grants concentrate
Fall Creek Farm and Nursery, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2018 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Fall sits between Floadia Corporation and GCX Corporation.
Fall's three-year grant acceleration
Fall Creek Farm and Nursery, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Fall's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Floadia
Floadia Corporation
25 patents
- Friedrich Miesche…
Friedrich Miescher Institute FOR Biomedical Research
25 patents
- Fujirebio
Fujirebio Inc.
25 patents
- Facetec
FaceTec, Inc.
25 patents
- Federal Cartridge
Federal Cartridge Company
25 patents
- Fluid Quip
Fluid Quip Technologies, LLC
25 patents
- Footprint Interna…
Footprint International, LLC
25 patents
- GCX
GCX Corporation
25 patents
- Fall Creek Farm a… ◀
Fall Creek Farm and Nursery, Inc.
25 patents
What this shows Fall holds 25 patents at rank #12,009, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Fall
By rank, the assignees closest to #12,009 in granted patent volume.
- Floadia Corporation #12,005 · 25 patents
- Friedrich Miescher Institute FOR Biomedical Research #12,006 · 25 patents
- Fujirebio Inc. #12,007 · 25 patents
- FaceTec, Inc. #12,008 · 25 patents
- Federal Cartridge Company #12,010 · 25 patents
- Fluid Quip Technologies, LLC #12,011 · 25 patents
- Footprint International, LLC #12,012 · 25 patents
- GCX Corporation #12,013 · 25 patents
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Fall, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (19 here).
Fall's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
19 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 8.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 8.0% |
| 2018 | 7 | 28.0% |
| 2019 | 1 | 4.0% |
| 2020 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 4 | 16.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 4.0% |
| 2024 | 1 | 4.0% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 8.0% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Fall Creek Farm and Nursery, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #12,005 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Fall Creek Farm and Nursery, Inc. against Floadia Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 18.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.