Overall rank by patents
#6,089
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 56 granted patents across 23 technology areas, active 2015–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A62C (FIRE-FIGHTING).
The verdict
Viking holds 56 US patents across 23 technology areas, rank #6,089 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Viking Group, Inc. has been granted 56 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing Viking Group, Inc. at rank #6,089 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 23 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in A62C (FIRE-FIGHTING). As a US Corporation, Viking Group, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Viking sits between Uptake Technologies, Inc. (56 patents, rank #6,085) and Yamaguchi University (56 patents, rank #6,093) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 45.0/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 29 grants, compared with 27 in the 2015–2019 window, a +7% shift in five-year velocity. Steady filing volume suggests sustained innovation without dramatic pivots. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Viking Group, Inc.'s 15.6 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 23 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Viking Group, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
UPTAKE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
56 patents
Ugreen Group Limited
56 patents
Velodyne Lidar USA, Inc.
56 patents
Vibrant Holdings, LLC
56 patents
Vocollect, Inc.
56 patents
Voestalpine Stahl GmbH
56 patents
WITTENSTEIN SE
56 patents
YAMAGUCHI UNIVERSITY
56 patents
Viking Group, Inc.
56 patents
What this shows Viking holds 56 patents at rank #6,089, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #6,089 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Viking's primary technology class.
Viking's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 24% higher than 76% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 8 | 14.3% |
| 2016 | 4 | 7.1% |
| 2017 | 1 | 1.8% |
| 2018 | 9 | 16.1% |
| 2019 | 5 | 8.9% |
| 2020 | 9 | 16.1% |
| 2021 | 3 | 5.4% |
| 2023 | 6 | 10.7% |
| 2024 | 6 | 10.7% |
| 2025 | 5 | 8.9% |
Top 15 of 23 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#6,089
Across all tracked assignees
45.0 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Viking's 56 grants land it in the top 24% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.