Valentino S.p.A.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 160 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Valentino ranks #2,452 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 160 patents across 0 technology areas.
- #2,452
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 34th percentile
- by Innovation Score (30.4/100)
- 1.0
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R2452 · Foreign Corporation #2,452 · 160 grants
GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MID 160 grants
- TOP-DECILE #2,452/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Qomplx
- CPC-UNK CPC blank
- INNOV-THIN 30.4/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Qomplx LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Valentino’s 30.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Valentino
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- C-Smartlink… · near 30
C-Smartlink… · near
30 score
- Exact Sciences… · near 30
Exact Sciences… · near
30 score
- Ojai Retinal… · near 30
Ojai Retinal… · near
30 score
- SugarCRM · near 30
SugarCRM · near
30 score
- Valentino S p A · this assignee 30
Valentino S p A · this assignee
30 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Valentino's Innovation Score is 30.4/100 (34th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Valentino?
Each dot is one of Valentino’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Valentino’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Valentino's grants concentrate
Valentino S.p.A. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2023 (25 grants) versus a trough of 6 in 2021. By volume, Valentino sits between Qomplx LLC and Fasteners for Retail, Inc..
Valentino's three-year grant acceleration
From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Valentino S.p.A. moved from 32 to 59 grants (1.84x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). Among 3,296 tracked assignees with ≥100 grants and ≥20 prior-period grants, that multiple ranks #257. See the growth leaderboard.
Who files at Valentino's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Qomplx
Qomplx LLC
160 patents
- Rolex
Rolex SA
160 patents
- Sybase
Sybase, Inc.
160 patents
- Trumpf Werkzeugma…
Trumpf Werkzeugmaschinen GmbH + Co. KG
160 patents
- Veoneer US
Veoneer US LLC
160 patents
- Valentino S p A ◀
Valentino S.p.A.
160 patents
- Atricure
AtriCure, Inc.
159 patents
- Elemental Scienti…
Elemental Scientific, Inc.
159 patents
- Fasteners for Ret…
Fasteners for Retail, Inc.
159 patents
What this shows Valentino holds 160 patents at rank #2,452, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Valentino
By rank, the assignees closest to #2,452 in granted patent volume.
- Qomplx LLC #2,448 · 160 patents
- Rolex SA #2,449 · 160 patents
- Sybase, Inc. #2,450 · 160 patents
- Trumpf Werkzeugmaschinen GmbH + Co. KG #2,451 · 160 patents
- Veoneer US LLC #2,453 · 160 patents
- AtriCure, Inc. #2,454 · 159 patents
- Elemental Scientific, Inc. #2,455 · 159 patents
- Fasteners for Retail, Inc. #2,456 · 159 patents
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Valentino, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (30 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (1.0 here).
Valentino's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
30 34th percentile higher than 34% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 11 | 6.9% |
| 2016 | 16 | 10.0% |
| 2017 | 14 | 8.8% |
| 2018 | 22 | 13.8% |
| 2019 | 14 | 8.8% |
| 2020 | 12 | 7.5% |
| 2021 | 6 | 3.8% |
| 2022 | 18 | 11.3% |
| 2023 | 25 | 15.6% |
| 2024 | 16 | 10.0% |
| 2025partial year | 6 | 3.8% |
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Valentino S.p.A.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Ranked #2,452 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Valentino S.p.A. against Qomplx LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 30.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.