Where does University OF Dayton rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), University OF Dayton ranks #7,640 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does University OF Dayton hold?

University OF Dayton holds 43 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 61 technology areas.

What is University OF Dayton's Innovation Score?

University OF Dayton has an Innovation Score of 51.3 out of 100 (top 12% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does University OF Dayton focus on?

University OF Dayton's top technology area is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models) with 14 patents, ranking #609 of 4,479 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 61 CPC subclasses total.

Is University OF Dayton's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

University OF Dayton's recent grant velocity is -26% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for University OF Dayton's patents?

University OF Dayton's patents average 16.5 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the University OF Dayton patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

University OF Dayton

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 43 granted patents across 61 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, University ranks #7,640 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 43 patents across 61 technology areas.

#7,640
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 12%
by Innovation Score (51.3/100): 16.5
avg claims per patent: -26%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7640 · US Corporation #7,640 · 43 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 43 grants
UPPER-Q #7,640/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Teladoc Health
CPC-WIDE G06N · 61 areas
INNOV-PAR 51.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 16.5 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -26% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Teladoc Health, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How University’s 51.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.1 pts (26%) Velocity 3.3 pts (6%) Breadth 25.0 pts (49%) Claim depth 9.9 pts (19%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
CCL Label · near

51
Danfoss Power… · near

51
Recensmedical · near

51
Tecnotree · near

51
University OF Dayton · this assignee

51
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows University's Innovation Score is 51.3/100 (top 12% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for University?

Each dot is one of University’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). University’s own 16.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

University vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

How University's grant cadence moved

Between 2020–2024, University OF Dayton received 17 grants versus 23 in 2015–2019 (-26% equal-window velocity, below median growth). Across complete PatentsView years, output peaked in 2015 at 11 grants and bottomed in 2018 at 1. Lead class G06N accounts for 32.6% of the portfolio across 61 subclasses. Volume neighbours: Teladoc Health, Inc. (#7,636) and Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, LLC (#7,644).

University's three-year grant acceleration

University OF Dayton shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 14 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Teladoc Health

43
The Fynder Group

43
The University of…

43
Unilumin Group

43
University OF Hou…

43
University of Nor…

43
Vaccinex

43
Victoria's Secret…

43
University OF Day… ◀

43

What this shows University holds 43 patents at rank #7,640, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near University

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,640 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Mo…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in University's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for University, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Mo…), University ranks #609 of 4,479 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (51 here).

Danfoss Power Solutions Inc. 51 Recensmedical, Inc. 51 CCL Label, Inc. 51 Tecnotree Technologies, Inc. 51

University's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

51 Top 12% higher than 88% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

University OF Dayton patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	11	25.6%
2016	5	11.6%
2017	2	4.7%
2018	1	2.3%
2019	4	9.3%
2020	6	14.0%
2021	4	9.3%
2022	2	4.7%
2023	2	4.7%
2024	3	7.0%
2025partial year	3	7.0%

Which technologies does University OF Dayton patent most?

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 14

G11C - Static Stores 13

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 6

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 5

C01B - Non-metallic ELEMENTS; Compounds THEREOF; ; Metalloids OR Compounds Thereof NOT Covered BY Subclass C01c 4

Y02E - Reduction OF Greenhouse GAS [GHG] Emissions, Related TO Energy Generation, Transmission OR Distribution 4

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 3

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 3

Y10S - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests 3

H01M - Processes OR Means, e.g. Batteries, FOR THE Direct Conversion OF Chemical Energy Into Electrical Energy 3

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 3

G06K - Graphical Data Reading ; Presentation OF DATA; Record CARRIERS; Handling Record Carriers 2

B82Y - Specific Uses OR Applications OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Measurement OR Analysis OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Manufacture OR Treatment OF Nanostructures 2

C23C - Coating Metallic MATERIAL; Coating Material With Metallic MATERIAL; Surface Treatment OF Metallic Material BY Diffusion Into THE Surface, BY Chemical Conversion OR SUBSTITUTION; Coating BY Vacuum Evaporation, BY Sputtering, BY ION Implantation OR BY Chemical Vapour Deposition, IN General 2

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 2

Top 15 of 61 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

University OF Dayton's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

University OF Dayton's lead technology class is G06N (Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models), 32.6% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06N
Ranked #7,640 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare University OF Dayton against Teladoc Health, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 51.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.