Where does TriMed Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), TriMed Inc. ranks #12,272 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does TriMed Inc. hold?

TriMed Inc. holds 25 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is TriMed Inc.'s Innovation Score?

TriMed Inc. has an Innovation Score of 40.9 out of 100 (top 34% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does TriMed Inc. focus on?

TriMed Inc.'s top technology area is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification) with 21 patents, ranking #851 of 7,127 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is TriMed Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

TriMed Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -29% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for TriMed Inc.'s patents?

TriMed Inc.'s patents average 23.6 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the TriMed Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

TriMed Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Trimed ranks #12,272 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 3 technology areas.

#12,272
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 34%
by Innovation Score (40.9/100): 23.6
avg claims per patent: -29%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12272 · US Corporation #12,272 · 25 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 25 grants
UPPER-Q #12,272/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Thetford
CPC-NARROW A61B · 3 areas
INNOV-PAR 40.9/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 23.6 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -29% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Thetford LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Trimed’s 40.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.3 pts (28%) Velocity 9.3 pts (23%) Breadth 6.1 pts (15%) Claim depth 14.1 pts (35%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Banma Zhixing… · near

41
Fine M-tec · near

41
Ocean Spray… · near

41
Rompower Technology… · near

41
TriMed · this assignee

41
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Trimed's Innovation Score is 40.9/100 (top 34% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Trimed?

Each dot is one of Trimed’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Trimed’s own 23.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Trimed vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Trimed's grants concentrate

TriMed Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 84% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Trimed sits between Thetford LLC and Trustonic Limited.

Trimed's three-year grant acceleration

TriMed Inc. shows 7 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Thetford

25
Thumbs Up Innovat…

25
Tillotts Pharma

25
Tipping Point Gro…

25
Triple Ring

25
Trividia Health

25
Trojan Leisure Pr…

25
Trustonic

25
Trimed ◀

25

What this shows TriMed holds 25 patents at rank #12,270, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near TriMed

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,270 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in TriMed's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for TriMed, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61B (Diagnosis), TriMed ranks #851 of 7,127 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (41 here).

Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. 41 Rompower Technology Holdings, LLC 41 Fine M-tec Co., Ltd 41 Banma Zhixing Network (HONGKONG) Co., Limited 41

Trimed's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

41 Top 34% higher than 66% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

TriMed Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	3	12.0%
2016	5	20.0%
2017	1	4.0%
2018	3	12.0%
2019	2	8.0%
2020	1	4.0%
2021	2	8.0%
2022	4	16.0%
2023	1	4.0%
2024	2	8.0%
2025partial year	1	4.0%

Which technologies does TriMed Inc. patent most?

A61B - DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification 21

A61F - Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive DEVICES; FOMENTATION; Treatment OR Protection OF Eyes OR EARS; Bandages, Dressings OR Absorbent PADS; Firs 5

B21D - Working OR Processing OF Sheet Metal OR Metal Tubes, Rods OR Profiles Without Essentially Removing MATERIAL; Punching Metal 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

TriMed Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

TriMed Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 84% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
Ranked #12,272 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare TriMed Inc. against Thetford LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 40.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.