TriMark Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 24 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Trimark ranks #12,723 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 24 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #12,723
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 50%
- by Innovation Score (35.3/100)
- 14.0
- avg claims per patent
- -47%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R12723 · US Corporation #12,723 · 24 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 24 grants
- MID-PACK #12,723/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Thermo Fisher…
- CPC-FOCUS E05B · 14 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.3/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 14.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -47% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville) LLC (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Trimark’s 35.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Trimark
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- TriMark · this assignee
TriMark · this assignee
35 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Trimark's Innovation Score is 35.3/100 (top 50% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Trimark?
Each dot is one of Trimark’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Trimark’s own 14.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Trimark's grants concentrate
TriMark Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2022. By volume, Trimark sits between Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville) LLC and Tymphany HK Limited.
Trimark's three-year grant acceleration
TriMark Corporation shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 8 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at TriMark's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Thermo Fisher Sci…
Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville) LLC
24 patents
- Thule IP AB
Thule IP AB
24 patents
- Tianjin Universit…
Tianjin University of Science and Technology
24 patents
- Touchcast
Touchcast, Inc.
24 patents
- Trikausa
TrikaUSA Inc.
24 patents
- Troy Group
Troy Group, Inc.
24 patents
- Turncare
TurnCare, Inc.
24 patents
- Tymphany HK
Tymphany HK Limited
24 patents
- Trimark ◀
TriMark Corporation
24 patents
What this shows TriMark holds 24 patents at rank #12,722, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near TriMark
By rank, the assignees closest to #12,722 in granted patent volume.
- Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville) LLC #12,718 · 24 patents
- Thule IP AB #12,719 · 24 patents
- Tianjin University of Science and Technology #12,720 · 24 patents
- Touchcast, Inc. #12,721 · 24 patents
- TrikaUSA Inc. #12,723 · 24 patents
- Troy Group, Inc. #12,724 · 24 patents
- TurnCare, Inc. #12,725 · 24 patents
- Tymphany HK Limited #12,726 · 24 patents
Leaders in E05B (Locks)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in TriMark's primary technology class.
Trimark's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 Top 50% higher than 50% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 16.7% |
| 2016 | 2 | 8.3% |
| 2017 | 4 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 2 | 8.3% |
| 2019 | 3 | 12.5% |
| 2020 | 2 | 8.3% |
| 2021 | 3 | 12.5% |
| 2022 | 1 | 4.2% |
| 2023 | 1 | 4.2% |
| 2024 | 1 | 4.2% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 4.2% |
Which technologies does TriMark Corporation patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
TriMark Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- TriMark Corporation's lead technology class is E05B (LOCKS; Accessories THEREFOR; Handcuffs), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore E05B
- Ranked #12,723 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare TriMark Corporation against Thermo Fisher Scientific (Asheville) LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.