TransparenSee LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Transparensee ranks #30,445 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #30,445
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 37th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.3/100)
- 20.3
- avg claims per patent
- +67%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R30445 · US Corporation #30,445 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #30,445/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Toyota Mapmaster…
- CPC-NARROW G07F · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.3/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 20.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +67% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Toyota Mapmaster Incorporated (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Transparensee’s 31.3 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Transparensee
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- TransparenSee · this assignee 31
TransparenSee · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Transparensee's Innovation Score is 31.3/100 (37th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Transparensee?
Each dot is one of Transparensee’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Transparensee’s own 20.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.1 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Transparensee's grants concentrate
TransparenSee LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 66.7% of grants classified under G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Transparensee sits between Toyota Mapmaster Incorporated and TriLink BioTechnologies, LLC.
Transparensee's three-year grant acceleration
TransparenSee LLC shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at TransparenSee's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Toyota Mapmaster…
Toyota Mapmaster Incorporated
9 patents
- Trace-ability
Trace-Ability, Inc.
9 patents
- Tracie Wireless
Tracie Wireless LLC
9 patents
- Transonic Systems
Transonic Systems Inc.
9 patents
- Treasure Data
Treasure Data, Inc.
9 patents
- Treau
Treau, Inc.
9 patents
- Tri-tec Manufactu…
Tri-Tec Manufacturing, LLC
9 patents
- Trilink Biotechno…
TriLink BioTechnologies, LLC
9 patents
- Transparensee ◀
TransparenSee LLC
9 patents
What this shows TransparenSee holds 9 patents at rank #30,428, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near TransparenSee
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,428 in granted patent volume.
- Toyota Mapmaster Incorporated #30,424 · 9 patents
- Trace-Ability, Inc. #30,425 · 9 patents
- Tracie Wireless LLC #30,426 · 9 patents
- Transonic Systems Inc. #30,427 · 9 patents
- Treasure Data, Inc. #30,429 · 9 patents
- Treau, Inc. #30,430 · 9 patents
- Tri-Tec Manufacturing, LLC #30,431 · 9 patents
- TriLink BioTechnologies, LLC #30,432 · 9 patents
Leaders in G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in TransparenSee's primary technology class.
Transparensee's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 37th percentile higher than 37% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2019 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2020 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2022 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does TransparenSee LLC patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
TransparenSee LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- TransparenSee LLC's lead technology class is G07F (Coin-freed OR Like Apparatus), 66.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G07F
- Ranked #30,445 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare TransparenSee LLC against Toyota Mapmaster Incorporated, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.