Overall rank by patents
#10,794
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 29 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Titan ranks #10,794 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 29 patents across 18 technology areas.
Titan Spine, Llc has been granted 29 US utility patents between 2015 and 2024, placing Titan Spine, Llc at #10,794 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 18 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 19.6 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61F (FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, e.g. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE). As a US Corporation, Titan Spine, Llc is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Titan sits between The Procter & Gamble Plaza (29 patents, rank #10,795) and Uchiyama Manufacturing Corp. (29 patents, rank #10,803) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 45.1/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 12 grants, compared with 17 in the 2015–2019 window, a -29% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Titan Spine, Llc's 19.6 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 18 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
The Procter & Gamble Plaza
29 patents
The Q, LLC
29 patents
The Ridge Wallet LLC
29 patents
Tipper Tie, Inc.
29 patents
Tri State Distribution, Inc.
29 patents
Trodat GmbH
29 patents
Troy-CSL Lighting, Inc.
29 patents
UCHIYAMA MANUFACTURING CORP.
29 patents
Titan Spine, LLC
29 patents
What this shows Titan holds 29 patents at rank #10,799, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #10,799 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Titan's primary technology class.
Titan's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
45 Top 24% higher than 76% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 6 | 20.7% |
| 2016 | 5 | 17.2% |
| 2017 | 4 | 13.8% |
| 2018 | 2 | 6.9% |
| 2020 | 3 | 10.3% |
| 2021 | 3 | 10.3% |
| 2022 | 3 | 10.3% |
| 2023 | 2 | 6.9% |
| 2024 | 1 | 3.4% |
Top 15 of 18 technology areas
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#10,794
of 50,000 tracked assignees
45.1 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Titan's 29 grants land it in the top 24% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.