Overall rank by patents
#10,479
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 30 granted patents across 40 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61L (METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES;).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, The ranks #10,479 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 30 patents across 40 technology areas.
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R10479 · US Corporation #10,479 · 30 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
Nearest grant-volume peer: Tangle Teezer Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
Belden Canada ULC · near
53 score
Hong Kong Baptist Un… · near
53 score
The University Of Me… · this assignee
53 score
THK · near
53 score
Aventics · near
53 score
3D Lighting Innovati… · lowest
7 score
What this shows The University Of Memphis Research Foundation stamps GRANTS-SMALL, UPPER-Q, PHOTO-FINISH, CPC-WIDE, INNOV-PAR, CLAIMS-RICH, TYPE-USCORP, VEL-DROP, BOOK-FULL. Volume places it #10,479 of 50,000; Innovation Score 52.5/100 sits in the top 10% of the PatentsView-derived corpus. Closest grant-volume peer on this plate is Tangle Teezer Limited (±0 grants).
The University Of Memphis Research Foundation has been granted 30 US utility patents between 2015 and 2025, placing The University Of Memphis Research Foundation at #10,479 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 40 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 13.9 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61L (METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES;). As a US Corporation, The University Of Memphis Research Foundation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, The sits between Tangle Teezer Limited (30 patents, rank #10,481) and Topgolf International, Inc. (30 patents, rank #10,489) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 52.5/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Between 2020 and 2024 the company received 8 grants, compared with 21 in the 2015–2019 window, a -62% shift in five-year grant velocity. Both windows cover five complete grant years; the latest PatentsView year is a partial release and is excluded from this comparison, though it still appears in the yearly table and chart below. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a company’s application activity. The US Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. The University Of Memphis Research Foundation's 13.9 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 40 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Tangle Teezer Limited
30 patents
Technology Innovation Momentum Fund (Israel) Limited Partnership
30 patents
Tensorcom, Inc.
30 patents
The Technology Partnership PLC
30 patents
Thrive Bioscience, Inc.
30 patents
Thule NV
30 patents
Tokyo Parts Industrial Co., Ltd.
30 patents
Topgolf International, Inc.
30 patents
The University of Memphis Research Foundation
30 patents
What this shows The holds 30 patents at rank #10,485, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #10,485 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in The's primary technology class.
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for The, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (53 here).
The's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
53 Top 10% higher than 90% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 4 | 13.3% |
| 2016 | 3 | 10.0% |
| 2017 | 8 | 26.7% |
| 2018 | 4 | 13.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 6.7% |
| 2020 | 1 | 3.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 3.3% |
| 2022 | 3 | 10.0% |
| 2023 | 1 | 3.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 6.7% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 3.3% |
Top 15 of 40 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#10,479
of 50,000 tracked assignees
52.5 out of 100
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.