Where does THE Janger Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), THE Janger Limited ranks #19,243 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does THE Janger Limited hold?

THE Janger Limited holds 15 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 5 technology areas.

What is THE Janger Limited's Innovation Score?

THE Janger Limited has an Innovation Score of 30.1 out of 100 (33rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does THE Janger Limited focus on?

THE Janger Limited's top technology area is A47G (Household OR Table Equipment) with 5 patents, ranking #92 of 709 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 5 CPC subclasses total.

Is THE Janger Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

THE Janger Limited's recent grant velocity is -73% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for THE Janger Limited's patents?

THE Janger Limited's patents average 4.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the THE Janger Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

THE Janger Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 15 granted patents across 5 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47G (Household OR Table Equipment).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, THE ranks #19,243 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 15 patents across 5 technology areas.

#19,243
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 33rd percentile
by Innovation Score (30.1/100): 4.4
avg claims per patent: -73%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R19243 · Foreign Corporation #19,243 · 15 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 15 grants
MID-PACK #19,243/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH TGR Construction
CPC-NARROW A47G · 5 areas
INNOV-THIN 30.1/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 4.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-DROP -73% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: TGR Construction, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How THE’s 30.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.6 pts (32%) Velocity 10.0 pts (33%) Breadth 7.9 pts (26%) Claim depth 2.6 pts (9%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
THE Janger · this assignee

30
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows THE's Innovation Score is 30.1/100 (33rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for THE?

Each dot is one of THE’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). THE’s own 4.4 claims/patent is at or below the 16.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

THE vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where THE's grants concentrate

THE Janger Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 5 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under A47G (Household OR Table Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, THE sits between TGR Construction, Inc. and Theraclion SA.

THE's three-year grant acceleration

THE Janger Limited shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

TGR Construction

15
THE Bionics Insti…

15
THE Comfort Compa…

15
THE Commonwealth…

15
THE NEW Genius (S…

15
THE United States…

15
THE United States…

15
Theraclion

15
THE Janger ◀

15

What this shows THE holds 15 patents at rank #19,226, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near THE

By rank, the assignees closest to #19,226 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A47G (Household OR Table Equipment)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in THE's primary technology class.

THE's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

30 33rd percentile higher than 33% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

THE Janger Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	6.7%
2016	2	13.3%
2017	3	20.0%
2018	3	20.0%
2019	2	13.3%
2022	1	6.7%
2023	1	6.7%
2024	1	6.7%
2025partial year	1	6.7%

Which technologies does THE Janger Limited patent most?

A47G - Household OR Table Equipment 5

A47F - Special Furniture, Fittings, OR Accessories FOR Shops, Storehouses, Bars, Restaurants OR THE LIKE; Paying Counters 3

Y10T - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former US Classification 2

B65D - Containers FOR Storage OR Transport OF Articles OR Materials, e.g. Bags, Barrels, Bottles, Boxes, Cans, Cartons, Crates, Drums, Jars, Tanks, Hoppers, Forwarding CONTAINERS; Accessories, Closures, OR Fittings THEREFOR; Packaging ELEMENTS; Packages 2

G09F - DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals 1

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

THE Janger Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

THE Janger Limited's lead technology class is A47G (Household OR Table Equipment), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47G
Ranked #19,243 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare THE Janger Limited against TGR Construction, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 30.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.