Where does That Corporation rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), That Corporation ranks #30,375 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does That Corporation hold?

That Corporation holds 9 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2024, spanning 8 technology areas.

What is That Corporation's Innovation Score?

That Corporation has an Innovation Score of 45.3 out of 100 (top 24% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does That Corporation focus on?

That Corporation's top technology area is H03G (Control OF Amplification) with 7 patents, ranking #52 of 417 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 8 CPC subclasses total.

Is That Corporation's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

That Corporation's recent grant velocity is +25% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for That Corporation's patents?

That Corporation's patents average 12.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the That Corporation patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

That Corporation

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H03G (Control OF Amplification).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, That ranks #30,375 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 8 technology areas.

#30,375
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 24%
by Innovation Score (45.3/100): 12.2
avg claims per patent: +25%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R30375 · US Corporation #30,375 · 9 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
MID-PACK #30,375/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Texecom
CPC-NARROW H03G · 8 areas
INNOV-PAR 45.3/100
CLAIMS-RICH 12.2 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-UP +25% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Texecom Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How That’s 45.3 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 8.0 pts (18%) Velocity 20.0 pts (44%) Breadth 10.0 pts (22%) Claim depth 7.3 pts (16%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
That · this assignee

45
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows That's Innovation Score is 45.3/100 (top 24% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for That?

Each dot is one of That’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). That’s own 12.2 claims/patent is at or below the 14.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

That vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where That's grants concentrate

That Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 77.8% of grants classified under H03G (Control OF Amplification). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, That sits between Texecom Limited and THE JOY Factory, Inc..

That's three-year grant acceleration

That Corporation shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Texecom

9
TFI Digital Media

9
TGI Technology PTE

9
Thales E-security

9
THE Chancellor Ma…

9
THE DOW Chemical

9
THE Government OF…

9
THE JOY Factory

9
That ◀

9

What this shows That holds 9 patents at rank #30,317, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near That

By rank, the assignees closest to #30,317 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in H03G (Control OF Amplification)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in That's primary technology class.

That's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

45 Top 24% higher than 76% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

That Corporation patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	2	22.2%
2016	1	11.1%
2017	1	11.1%
2020	1	11.1%
2022	1	11.1%
2023	2	22.2%
2024	1	11.1%

Which technologies does That Corporation patent most?

H03G - Control OF Amplification 7

H04S - Stereophonic Systems 5

H04R - Loudspeakers, Microphones, Gramophone Pick-ups OR Like Acoustic Electromechanical TRANSDUCERS; Deaf-aid SETS; Public Address Systems 5

H03H - Impedance Networks, e.g. Resonant CIRCUITS; Resonators 2

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 2

G10L - Speech Analysis Techniques OR Speech SYNTHESIS; Speech RECOGNITION; Speech OR Voice Processing TECHNIQUES; Speech OR Audio Coding OR Decoding 1

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 1

H03F - Amplifiers 1

Top 8 of 8 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

That Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

That Corporation's lead technology class is H03G (Control OF Amplification), 77.8% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H03G
Ranked #30,375 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare That Corporation against Texecom Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 45.3/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.