Tang Yang Dies Co. Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H01R (Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Tang ranks #43,500 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #43,500
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 2nd percentile
- by Innovation Score (12.9/100)
- 2.0
- avg claims per patent
- -80%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R43500 · Foreign Corporation #43,500 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #43,500/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Taleris Global LLP
- CPC-NARROW H01R · 2 areas
- INNOV-LOW 12.9/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -80% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Taleris Global LLP (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Tang’s 12.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Tang
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Tang Yang Dies · this assignee 13
Tang Yang Dies · this assignee
13 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Tang's Innovation Score is 12.9/100 (2nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Tang?
Each dot is one of Tang’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Tang’s own 2.0 claims/patent is at or below the 17.2 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Tang's grants concentrate
Tang Yang Dies Co. Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 16.7% of grants classified under H01R (Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Tang sits between Taleris Global LLP and Taniobis GMBH.
Who files at Tang's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Taleris Global LLP
Taleris Global LLP
6 patents
- Taminco BV
Taminco BV
6 patents
- Tampro
Tampro Inc.
6 patents
- TAN DE Tech
TAN DE Tech Co., Ltd.
6 patents
- Tangen Biosciences
Tangen Biosciences, Inc.
6 patents
- Tangentix
Tangentix Limited
6 patents
- Tangi0
Tangi0 Limited
6 patents
- Taniobis
Taniobis GMBH
6 patents
- Tang Yang Dies ◀
Tang Yang Dies Co. Ltd.
6 patents
What this shows Tang holds 6 patents at rank #43,463, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Tang
By rank, the assignees closest to #43,463 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in H01R (Electrically-conductive Connections)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Tang's primary technology class.
- Sumitomo Wiring Systems, Ltd. 1,543 in class
- Yazaki Corporation 1,482 in class
- Foxconn Interconnect Technology Limited 847 in class
- Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. 729 in class
- Autonetworks Technologies, Ltd. 694 in class
- Molex, LLC 599 in class
- Japan Aviation Electronics Industry, Limited 523 in class
- TE Connectivity Co. Ltd. 459 in class
Tang's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
13 2nd percentile higher than 2% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2019 | 2 | 33.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Tang Yang Dies Co. Ltd. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Tang Yang Dies Co. Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Tang Yang Dies Co. Ltd.'s lead technology class is H01R (Electrically-conductive CONNECTIONS; Structural Associations OF A Plurality OF Mutually-insulated Electrical Connecting ELEMENTS; Coupling DEVICES; Current Collectors), 16.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H01R
- Ranked #43,500 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Tang Yang Dies Co. Ltd. against Taleris Global LLP, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 12.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.