StratoScientific, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Stratoscientific ranks #27,521 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #27,521
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 6th percentile
- by Innovation Score (19.7/100)
- 8.8
- avg claims per patent
- -89%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R27521 · US Corporation #27,521 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #27,521/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH StickyBones
- CPC-NARROW A61B · 3 areas
- INNOV-LOW 19.7/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -89% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: StickyBones Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Stratoscientific’s 19.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Stratoscientific
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- StratoScientific · this assignee 20
StratoScientific · this assignee
20 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Stratoscientific's Innovation Score is 19.7/100 (6th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Stratoscientific?
Each dot is one of Stratoscientific’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Stratoscientific’s own 8.8 claims/patent is at or below the 12.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Stratoscientific's grants concentrate
StratoScientific, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 60% of grants classified under A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Stratoscientific sits between StickyBones Inc. and Streamroot.
Who files at StratoScientific's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Stickybones
StickyBones Inc.
10 patents
- Stopak India Pvt
Stopak India Pvt. Ltd.
10 patents
- Strategic Exits
Strategic Exits LLC
10 patents
- Strato Scale
Strato Scale Ltd.
10 patents
- Stratospheric Pla…
Stratospheric Platforms Ltd
10 patents
- Streamlayer
StreamLayer Inc.
10 patents
- Streamsets
StreamSets, Inc.
10 patents
- Streamroot
Streamroot
10 patents
- Stratoscientific ◀
StratoScientific, Inc.
10 patents
What this shows StratoScientific holds 10 patents at rank #27,527, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near StratoScientific
By rank, the assignees closest to #27,527 in granted patent volume.
- StickyBones Inc. #27,523 · 10 patents
- Stopak India Pvt. Ltd. #27,524 · 10 patents
- Strategic Exits LLC #27,525 · 10 patents
- Strato Scale Ltd. #27,526 · 10 patents
- Stratospheric Platforms Ltd #27,528 · 10 patents
- StreamLayer Inc. #27,529 · 10 patents
- StreamSets, Inc. #27,530 · 10 patents
- Streamroot #27,531 · 10 patents
Leaders in A61B (Diagnosis)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in StratoScientific's primary technology class.
- Covidien LP 5,709 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 3,414 in class
- Olympus Corporation 2,758 in class
- Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc. 2,362 in class
- Cilag GmbH International 2,063 in class
- Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. 1,921 in class
- DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. 1,796 in class
- Ethicon, Inc. 1,762 in class
Stratoscientific's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
20 6th percentile higher than 6% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 4 | 40.0% |
| 2017 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2018 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2019 | 2 | 20.0% |
| 2021 | 1 | 10.0% |
Which technologies does StratoScientific, Inc. patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
StratoScientific, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- StratoScientific, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; Identification), 60% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61B
- Ranked #27,521 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare StratoScientific, Inc. against StickyBones Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 19.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.