Still GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 12 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B66F (Hoisting, Lifting, Hauling OR Pushing, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, e.g. Devices Which Apply A Lifting OR Pushing Force Directly TO THE Surface OF A Load).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Still ranks #37,700 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 12 technology areas.
- #37,700
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 22%
- by Innovation Score (45.9/100)
- 10.7
- avg claims per patent
- +100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R37700 · Foreign Corporation #37,700 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- LOWER-Q #37,700/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Stek
- CPC-FOCUS B66F · 12 areas
- INNOV-PAR 45.9/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Stek Co., Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Still’s 45.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Still
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Still · this assignee
Still · this assignee
46 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Still's Innovation Score is 45.9/100 (top 22% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Still?
Each dot is one of Still’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Still’s own 10.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 7.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Still's grants concentrate
Still GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 12 CPC subclasses with 71.4% of grants classified under B66F (Hoisting, Lifting, Hauling OR Pushing, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, e.g. Devices Which Apply A Lifting OR Pushing Force Directly TO THE Surface OF A Load). By volume, Still sits between Stek Co., Ltd. and STP North America LLC.
Still's three-year grant acceleration
Still GmbH shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Still's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Stek
Stek Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Stella Mccartney
Stella Mccartney Limited
7 patents
- Steyr Mannlicher
Steyr Mannlicher GMBH
7 patents
- Stichting Maastri…
Stichting Maastricht Radiation Oncology Maastro Clinic
7 patents
- Stmec
Stmec, LLC
7 patents
- Stmicroelectron S…
STMicroelectron S.r.l.
7 patents
- Stmicroelectronic…
STMicroelectronics. KK
7 patents
- STP North America
STP North America LLC
7 patents
- Still ◀
Still GmbH
7 patents
What this shows Still holds 7 patents at rank #37,491, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Still
By rank, the assignees closest to #37,491 in granted patent volume.
- Stek Co., Ltd. #37,487 · 7 patents
- Stella Mccartney Limited #37,488 · 7 patents
- Steyr Mannlicher GMBH #37,489 · 7 patents
- Stichting Maastricht Radiation Oncology Maastro Clinic #37,490 · 7 patents
- Stmec, LLC #37,492 · 7 patents
- STMicroelectron S.r.l. #37,493 · 7 patents
- STMicroelectronics. KK #37,494 · 7 patents
- STP North America LLC #37,495 · 7 patents
Leaders in B66F (Hoisting)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Still's primary technology class.
Still's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
46 Top 22% higher than 78% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2018 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2022 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 14.3% |
Which technologies does Still GmbH patent most?
Top 12 of 12 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Still GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Still GmbH's lead technology class is B66F (Hoisting, Lifting, Hauling OR Pushing, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR, e.g. Devices Which Apply A Lifting OR Pushing Force Directly TO THE Surface OF A Load), 71.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B66F
- Ranked #37,700 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Still GmbH against Stek Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 45.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.