Overall rank by patents
#30,252
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 10 technology areas, active 2021–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61P (SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS).
The verdict
Stichting holds 9 US patents across 10 technology areas, rank #30,252 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Stichting Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum has been granted 9 US utility patents between 2021 and 2025, placing Stichting Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum at rank #30,252 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 10 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61P (SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS). As a Foreign Corporation, Stichting Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Stichting sits between Stealthbits Technologies Llc (9 patents, rank #30,248) and Stormtrap, Llc (9 patents, rank #30,256) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 48.9/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2021 through 2025, with 9 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Stichting Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum's 16.3 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 10 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Stichting Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Stealthbits Technologies LLC
9 patents
Steel King Industries, Inc.
9 patents
Stemline Therapeutics, Inc.
9 patents
Sterling Industry Consult GmbH
9 patents
Stichting VU
9 patents
Stopinc Aktiengesellschaft
9 patents
Storage Engine, Inc.
9 patents
Stormtrap, LLC
9 patents
Stichting Radboud universitair medisch centrum
9 patents
What this shows Stichting holds 9 patents at rank #30,252, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,252 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Stichting's primary technology class.
Stichting's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
49 Top 16% higher than 84% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2022 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2024 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 2025 | 1 | 11.1% |
Top 10 of 10 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#30,252
Across all tracked assignees
48.9 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Stichting's 9 grants land it in the top 16% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.