USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Sport Squad, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Sport ranks #27,488 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 3 technology areas.

#27,488
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
5th percentile
by Innovation Score (18.1/100)
6.2
avg claims per patent
+700%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R27488 · US Corporation #27,488 · 10 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
  • MID-PACK #27,488/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Spectralink
  • CPC-NARROW A63B · 3 areas
  • INNOV-LOW 18.1/100
  • CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-SURGE +700% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Spectralink Corporation (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Sport’s 18.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Sport

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Sport's Innovation Score is 18.1/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Sport?

Each dot is one of Sport’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Sport’s own 6.2 claims/patent is at or below the 14.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Sport vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 9.99.91010.1 0204060 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Spectralink Corporation - 10, 6.6SpectralinkSpellbound Development Group, Inc. - 10, 12.7Spellbound Develo…Spinal Singularity, Inc. - 10, 20.1Spinal SingularitySpindle 360, Inc. - 10, 4.5Spindle 360SpringActive, Inc. - 10, 18.9SpringactiveSpringcoin, Inc. - 10, 21.4SpringcoinSproutel Inc. - 10, 14.6SproutelSpyCloud, Inc. - 10, 53.2SpycloudSport Squad, Inc. - 10, 6.2Sport Squad
Sport vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Sport's grants concentrate

Sport Squad, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 30% of grants classified under A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Sport sits between Spectralink Corporation and SpyCloud, Inc..

Who files at Sport's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Sport holds 10 patents at rank #27,507, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Sport

By rank, the assignees closest to #27,507 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Sport's primary technology class.

Sport's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

18 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

02468 2017202020212025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Sport Squad, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2017 1 10.0%
2020 1 10.0%
2021 7 70.0%
2025partial year 1 10.0%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Sport Squad, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Sport Squad, Inc.'s lead technology class is A63B (Apparatus FOR Physical Training, Gymnastics, Swimming, Climbing, OR FENCING; Ball GAMES; Training Equipment), 30% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A63B
  • Ranked #27,488 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Sport Squad, Inc. against Spectralink Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 18.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.