Spinal Modulation, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2016. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Spinal ranks #30,232 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #30,232
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 38th percentile
- by Innovation Score (31.4/100)
- 24.7
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R30232 · US Corporation #30,232 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #30,232/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Speedata
- CPC-NARROW A61N · 6 areas
- INNOV-THIN 31.4/100
- CLAIMS-DENSE 24.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Speedata Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Spinal’s 31.4 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Spinal
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Spinal Modulation · this assignee 31
Spinal Modulation · this assignee
31 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Spinal's Innovation Score is 31.4/100 (38th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Spinal?
Each dot is one of Spinal’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Spinal’s own 24.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Spinal's grants concentrate
Spinal Modulation, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 88.9% of grants classified under A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Spinal sits between Speedata Ltd. and Sportsbeams Lighting, Inc..
Who files at Spinal's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Speedata
Speedata Ltd.
9 patents
- Speira
Speira GmbH
9 patents
- Spencer Composites
Spencer Composites Corporation
9 patents
- Spin Tech
Spin Tech, Inc.
9 patents
- Spire
Spire, Inc.
9 patents
- Splash About Inte…
Splash About International Limited
9 patents
- Sportlogiq
Sportlogiq Inc.
9 patents
- Sportsbeams Light…
Sportsbeams Lighting, Inc.
9 patents
- Spinal Modulation ◀
Spinal Modulation, Inc.
9 patents
What this shows Spinal holds 9 patents at rank #30,232, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Spinal
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,232 in granted patent volume.
- Speedata Ltd. #30,228 · 9 patents
- Speira GmbH #30,229 · 9 patents
- Spencer Composites Corporation #30,230 · 9 patents
- Spin Tech, Inc. #30,231 · 9 patents
- Spire, Inc. #30,233 · 9 patents
- Splash About International Limited #30,234 · 9 patents
- Sportlogiq Inc. #30,235 · 9 patents
- Sportsbeams Lighting, Inc. #30,236 · 9 patents
Leaders in A61N (Electrotherapy)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Spinal's primary technology class.
- Medtronic, Inc. 2,200 in class
- Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation 1,080 in class
- Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. 1,037 in class
- Pacesetter, Inc. 609 in class
- Zoll Medical Corporation 556 in class
- Koniniklijke Philips N.V. 534 in class
- Cochlear Limited 449 in class
- Varian Medical Systems, Inc. 296 in class
Spinal's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 38th percentile higher than 38% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 8 | 88.9% |
| 2016 | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does Spinal Modulation, Inc. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Spinal Modulation, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Spinal Modulation, Inc.'s lead technology class is A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; Radiation THERAPY; Ultrasound Therapy), 88.9% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61N
- Ranked #30,232 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Spinal Modulation, Inc. against Speedata Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 31.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.