Overall rank by patents
#2,385
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 164 granted patents across 30 technology areas, active 2020–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION).
The verdict
Smith holds 164 US patents across 30 technology areas, rank #2,385 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Smith & Nephew ASIA Pacific PTE. Limited has been granted 164 US utility patents between 2020 and 2025, placing Smith & Nephew ASIA Pacific PTE. Limited at rank #2,385 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 30 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 16.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61B (DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION). As a Foreign Corporation, Smith & Nephew ASIA Pacific PTE. Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Smith sits between Mettler-toledo Gmbh (164 patents, rank #2,381) and THE Japan Steel Works, Ltd. (164 patents, rank #2,389) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 66.8/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Historical data spans 2020 through 2025, with 164 total grants over that period. Velocity comparisons require five years of historical filings to calibrate. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Smith & Nephew ASIA Pacific PTE. Limited's 16.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 30 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Smith & Nephew ASIA Pacific PTE. Limited against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Mettler-Toledo GmbH
164 patents
NIO TECHNOLOGY (ANHUI) CO., LTD
164 patents
NIPPON SODA CO., LTD.
164 patents
SII Semiconductor Corporation
164 patents
SOLVAY SA
164 patents
Smiths Medical ASD, Inc.
164 patents
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS
164 patents
THE JAPAN STEEL WORKS, LTD.
164 patents
SMITH & NEPHEW ASIA PACIFIC PTE. LIMITED
164 patents
What this shows Smith holds 164 patents at rank #2,385, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #2,385 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Smith's primary technology class.
Smith's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
67 Top 1% higher than 99% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 5 | 3.0% |
| 2021 | 6 | 3.7% |
| 2022 | 30 | 18.3% |
| 2023 | 27 | 16.5% |
| 2024 | 47 | 28.7% |
| 2025 | 49 | 29.9% |
Top 15 of 30 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#2,385
Across all tracked assignees
66.8 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Smith's 164 grants land it in the top 1% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.