PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 130 granted patents across 16 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General).

RSS updates for this company
Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Shanghai ranks #2,936 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 130 patents across 16 technology areas.

#2,936
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
Top 2%
by Innovation Score (62.1/100)
18.6
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R2936 · Foreign Corporation #2,936 · 130 grants

GRANTS-MID · TOP-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-STRONG · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

  • GRANTS-MID 130 grants
  • TOP-DECILE #2,936/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Katalyst Surgical
  • CPC-FOCUS G06T · 16 areas
  • INNOV-STRONG 62.1/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 18.6 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • SPAN-YRS 2021–2025 · 5y
  • BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Katalyst Surgical, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Shanghai’s 62.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Shanghai

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Shanghai's Innovation Score is 62.1/100 (top 2% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Shanghai?

Each dot is one of Shanghai’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Shanghai’s own 18.6 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.9 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Shanghai vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 129.9129.9130130.1 5101520 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Katalyst Surgical, LLC - 130, 18.58Katalyst SurgicalMTU Friedrichshafen GMBH - 130, 12.42MTU Friedrichshaf…Munchkin, Inc. - 130, 13.89MunchkinSelf Electronics Co., Ltd. - 130, 10.05SelfSpinal Elements, Inc. - 130, 16.52Spinal ElementsTaiyuan University OF Technology - 130, 7.78Taiyuan Universit…Wangs Alliance Corporation - 130, 17.01Wangs AllianceXiamen Sanan Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. - 130, 16.45Xiamen Sanan Opto…Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd. - 130, 18.61Shanghai United I…
Shanghai vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Shanghai's grants concentrate

Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 16 CPC subclasses with 79.2% of grants classified under G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (38 grants) versus a trough of 14 in 2021. By volume, Shanghai sits between Katalyst Surgical, LLC and Xiamen Sanan Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd..

Shanghai's three-year grant acceleration

Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd. shows 101 grants in 2022–2024 against only 14 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Shanghai's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Shanghai holds 130 patents at rank #2,936, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Shanghai

By rank, the assignees closest to #2,936 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Shanghai's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Shanghai, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation), Shanghai ranks #156 of 6,389 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (62 here).

Schneider Electric IT Corporation 62 Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited 62 Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation 62 Sun Chemical Corporation 62

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (18.6 here).

Biosense Webster, Inc. 18.6 avg Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc. 18.6 avg R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company 18.6 avg Kba-notasys SA 18.6 avg

Shanghai's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

62 Top 2% higher than 98% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

10203040 20212022202320242025 15
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2021–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2021 14 10.8%
2022 34 26.2%
2023 29 22.3%
2024 38 29.2%
2025partial year 15 11.5%

Which technologies does Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd. patent most?

Top 15 of 16 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd.'s lead technology class is G06T (Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General), 79.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06T
  • Ranked #2,936 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd. against Katalyst Surgical, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 62.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.