Overall rank by patents
#10,749
of 50,000 tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 29 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2023β2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Shanghai ranks #10,749 of 50,000 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 29 patents across 0 technology areas.
Shanghai Geely Diran Automobile Design Co. Ltd has been granted 29 US utility patents between 2023 and 2024, placing Shanghai Geely Diran Automobile Design Co. Ltd at #10,749 of 50,000 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 0 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 1.0 claims per patent. As a Foreign Corporation, Shanghai Geely Diran Automobile Design Co. Ltd is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Shanghai sits between Scholar Rock, Inc. (29 patents, rank #10,759) and Shenzhen Smart Pet Technology Co., Ltd (29 patents, rank #10,767) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 32.4/100 blends portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Grant cadence records the difference between two grant-year windows. Historical data spans 2023 through 2024, with 29 total grants over that period. Grant timing can lag the related application by years, so this comparison does not establish current R&D spending, strategic intent, or a companyβs application activity. The Foreign Corporation classification provides context for the assignee record, not a conclusion about its business strategy.
Claim depth and technology breadth describe this aggregate record. Shanghai Geely Diran Automobile Design Co. Ltd's 1.0 average claims per patent is an average count, not a measure of claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk. The record spans 0 CPC subclasses. Combined with portfolio volume, these figures let readers compare the documented grant records of assignees in similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015β2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked β
Scholar Rock, Inc.
29 patents
Seasons 4, Inc.
29 patents
Secturion Systems, Inc.
29 patents
Selecta Biosciences, Inc.
29 patents
Shanghai OXi Technology Co., Ltd
29 patents
Shenzhen Envision Technology Innovation Co., Ltd.
29 patents
Shenzhen Kean Silicone Product Co., Ltd.
29 patents
Shenzhen Smart Pet Technology Co., Ltd
29 patents
Shanghai Geely Diran Automobile Design CO. LTD
29 patents
What this shows Shanghai holds 29 patents at rank #10,763, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #10,763 in granted patent volume.
Shanghai's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0β100)
32 Top 59% higher than 41% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score Β· 2015β2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020βpresent) versus the 2023β2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 19 | 65.5% |
| 2024 | 10 | 34.5% |
Historical grant data only; it does not rate legal strength or current strategy.
Overall rank by patents
#10,749
of 50,000 tracked assignees
32.4 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Shanghai's 29 grants land it in the top 59% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.