Where does John Pomp Studio rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), John Pomp Studio ranks #10,658 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does John Pomp Studio hold?

John Pomp Studio holds 29 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2025, spanning 0 technology areas.

What is John Pomp Studio's Innovation Score?

John Pomp Studio has an Innovation Score of 32.4 out of 100 (41st percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does John Pomp Studio focus on?

John Pomp Studio holds grants across 0 technology areas classified under the Cooperative Patent Classification system.

Is John Pomp Studio's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

John Pomp Studio's recent grant velocity is +600% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for John Pomp Studio's patents?

John Pomp Studio's patents average 1.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the John Pomp Studio patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

John Pomp Studio

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 29 granted patents across 0 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength.

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, John ranks #10,658 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 29 patents across 0 technology areas.

#10,658
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 41st percentile
by Innovation Score (32.4/100): 1.0
avg claims per patent: +600%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R10658 · US Corporation #10,658 · 29 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-UNK · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-SMALL 29 grants
UPPER-Q #10,658/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH In Ovation
CPC-UNK CPC blank
INNOV-THIN 32.4/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 1.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +600% vel
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: In Ovation LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How John’s 32.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 11.7 pts (36%) Velocity 20.0 pts (62%) Breadth 0.0 pts (0%) Claim depth 0.6 pts (2%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
John Pomp Studio · this assignee

32
Shanghai Geely… · near

32
Zhejiang Cheng's… · near

32
Tri-force Management · near

32
Tsunami MedTech · near

32
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows John's Innovation Score is 32.4/100 (41st percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for John?

Each dot is one of John’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). John’s own 1.0 claims/patent is at or below the 12.9 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

John vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where John's grants concentrate

John Pomp Studio is a focused PatentsView assignee: 0 CPC subclasses . Peak complete grant year is 2024 (12 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, John sits between In Ovation LLC and KOC Universitesi.

John's three-year grant acceleration

John Pomp Studio shows 17 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

In Ovation

29
Jentek Sensors

29
Joint Innovation…

29
JSW Aktina System

29
Aichi

29
Keppel Offshore &…

29
Kingfa SCI & Tech

29
KOC Universitesi

29
John Pomp Studio ◀

29

What this shows John holds 29 patents at rank #10,659, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near John

By rank, the assignees closest to #10,659 in granted patent volume.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for John, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above).

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (32 here).

Shanghai Geely Diran Automobile Design Co. Ltd 32 Zhejiang Cheng's Plastic Products Co., Ltd. 32 Tri-force Management Corporation 32 Tsunami MedTech, LLC 32

John's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

32 41st percentile higher than 41% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

John Pomp Studio patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	1	3.4%
2017	1	3.4%
2019	1	3.4%
2020	3	10.3%
2021	1	3.4%
2022	3	10.3%
2023	2	6.9%
2024	12	41.4%
2025partial year	5	17.2%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

John Pomp Studio's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Ranked #10,658 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare John Pomp Studio against In Ovation LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.