Overall rank by patents
#25,238
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2015–2018. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: Y02A (TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE).
The verdict
Sequoia holds 11 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #25,238 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Sequoia Sciences, Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2015 and 2018, placing Sequoia Sciences, Inc. at rank #25,238 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 26.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in Y02A (TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE). As a US Corporation, Sequoia Sciences, Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Sequoia sits between Semiconductor Energy Laboratories Co., Ltd. (11 patents, rank #25,234) and Sharp Semiconductor Innovation Corporation (11 patents, rank #25,242) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 30.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 11 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Sequoia Sciences, Inc.'s 26.4 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Sequoia Sciences, Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Semiconductor Energy Laboratories Co., Ltd.
11 patents
Senscomm Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
11 patents
Senseair AB
11 patents
Sentient Technologies (Barbados) Limited
11 patents
Shanghai Yingli Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
11 patents
Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries Co. Ltd
11 patents
Shared Space Studios Inc.
11 patents
Sharp Semiconductor Innovation Corporation
11 patents
Sequoia Sciences, Inc.
11 patents
What this shows Sequoia holds 11 patents at rank #25,238, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Sequoia's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
31 Top 65% higher than 35% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 27.3% |
| 2016 | 4 | 36.4% |
| 2017 | 1 | 9.1% |
| 2018 | 3 | 27.3% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#25,238
Across all tracked assignees
30.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Sequoia's 11 grants land it in the top 65% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.