Scrub Daddy, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 22 granted patents across 15 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47L (Domestic Washing OR Cleaning ; Suction Cleaners IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Scrub ranks #13,671 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 22 patents across 15 technology areas.
- #13,671
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 49%
- by Innovation Score (35.5/100)
- 7.1
- avg claims per patent
- -36%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13671 · US Corporation #13,671 · 22 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 22 grants
- MID-PACK #13,671/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Schwing
- CPC-FOCUS A47L · 15 areas
- INNOV-THIN 35.5/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 7.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -36% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Schwing GmbH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Scrub’s 35.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Scrub
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Scrub Daddy · this assignee
Scrub Daddy · this assignee
35 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Scrub's Innovation Score is 35.5/100 (top 49% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Scrub?
Each dot is one of Scrub’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Scrub’s own 7.1 claims/patent is at or below the 18.1 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Scrub's grants concentrate
Scrub Daddy, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 15 CPC subclasses with 36.4% of grants classified under A47L (Domestic Washing OR Cleaning ; Suction Cleaners IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Scrub sits between Suse LLC and Sharrow Engineering LLC.
Scrub's three-year grant acceleration
Scrub Daddy, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Scrub's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Suse
Suse LLC
22 patents
- Syntel
Syntel, Inc.
22 patents
- Schwing
Schwing GmbH
22 patents
- Sciencelogic
ScienceLogic, Inc.
22 patents
- Second Spectrum
Second Spectrum, Inc.
22 patents
- Serio-us Industri…
Serio-Us Industries, Inc.
22 patents
- Seven Marine
Seven Marine, LLC
22 patents
- Sharrow Engineeri…
Sharrow Engineering LLC
22 patents
- Scrub Daddy ◀
Scrub Daddy, Inc.
22 patents
What this shows Scrub holds 22 patents at rank #13,692, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Scrub
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,692 in granted patent volume.
- Suse LLC #13,688 · 22 patents
- Syntel, Inc. #13,689 · 22 patents
- Schwing GmbH #13,690 · 22 patents
- ScienceLogic, Inc. #13,691 · 22 patents
- Second Spectrum, Inc. #13,693 · 22 patents
- Serio-Us Industries, Inc. #13,694 · 22 patents
- Seven Marine, LLC #13,695 · 22 patents
- Sharrow Engineering LLC #13,696 · 22 patents
Leaders in A47L (Domestic Washing OR Cleaning)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Scrub's primary technology class.
Scrub's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
35 Top 49% higher than 51% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 4.5% |
| 2018 | 5 | 22.7% |
| 2019 | 5 | 22.7% |
| 2021 | 1 | 4.5% |
| 2022 | 1 | 4.5% |
| 2023 | 1 | 4.5% |
| 2024 | 4 | 18.2% |
| 2025partial year | 4 | 18.2% |
Which technologies does Scrub Daddy, Inc. patent most?
Top 15 of 15 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Scrub Daddy, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Scrub Daddy, Inc.'s lead technology class is A47L (Domestic Washing OR Cleaning ; Suction Cleaners IN General), 36.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47L
- Ranked #13,671 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Scrub Daddy, Inc. against Suse LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 35.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.