Where does Scientific Design Company, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Scientific Design Company, Inc. ranks #7,187 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Scientific Design Company, Inc. hold?

Scientific Design Company, Inc. holds 46 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2025, spanning 18 technology areas.

What is Scientific Design Company, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Scientific Design Company, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 43.4 out of 100 (top 28% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Scientific Design Company, Inc. focus on?

Scientific Design Company, Inc.'s top technology area is C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds) with 36 patents, ranking #232 of 3,165 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 18 CPC subclasses total.

Is Scientific Design Company, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Scientific Design Company, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is -33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for Scientific Design Company, Inc.'s patents?

Scientific Design Company, Inc.'s patents average 18.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Scientific Design Company, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Scientific Design Company, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 46 granted patents across 18 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Scientific ranks #7,187 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 46 patents across 18 technology areas.

#7,187
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 28%
by Innovation Score (43.4/100): 18.9
avg claims per patent: -33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R7187 · US Corporation #7,187 · 46 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 46 grants
UPPER-Q #7,187/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Secureworks
CPC-FOCUS C07D · 18 areas
INNOV-PAR 43.4/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DOWN -33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Secureworks Corp. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Scientific’s 43.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 13.3 pts (31%) Velocity 3.8 pts (9%) Breadth 15.0 pts (35%) Claim depth 11.3 pts (26%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Anhui Huami… · near

43
Risen (SUZHOU)… · near

43
Scientific Design · this assignee

43
TeraDiode · near

43
Tohoku Techno Arch · near

43
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Scientific's Innovation Score is 43.4/100 (top 28% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Scientific?

Each dot is one of Scientific’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Scientific’s own 18.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.4 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Scientific vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Scientific's grants concentrate

Scientific Design Company, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 18 CPC subclasses with 78.3% of grants classified under C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (11 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Scientific sits between Srgi Holdings LLC and Taylor Commercial Foodservice, LLC.

Scientific's three-year grant acceleration

Scientific Design Company, Inc. shows 8 grants in 2022–2024 against only 14 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Srgi Holdings

46
SRI Sports

46
Sukup Manufacturi…

46
Sumitomo Electric…

46
Secureworks

46
Sierra Nevada

46
Sonatus

46
Taylor Commercial…

46
Scientific Design ◀

46

What this shows Scientific holds 46 patents at rank #7,195, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Scientific

By rank, the assignees closest to #7,195 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Scientific's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Scientific, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds), Scientific ranks #232 of 3,165 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (43 here).

Tohoku Techno Arch Co., Ltd. 43 Anhui Huami Information Technology Co., Ltd. 43 TeraDiode, Inc. 43 Risen (SUZHOU) Pharma Tech Co., Ltd. 43

Scientific's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

43 Top 28% higher than 72% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Scientific Design Company, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	11	23.9%
2016	4	8.7%
2017	2	4.3%
2018	6	13.0%
2019	4	8.7%
2020	9	19.6%
2021	1	2.2%
2022	3	6.5%
2023	1	2.2%
2024	4	8.7%
2025partial year	1	2.2%

Which technologies does Scientific Design Company, Inc. patent most?

C07D - Heterocyclic Compounds 36

B01J - Chemical OR Physical Processes, e.g. Catalysis OR Colloid CHEMISTRY; Their Relevant Apparatus 32

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 23

C07C - Acyclic OR Carbocyclic Compounds 9

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 9

B01D - Separation 8

C01F - Compounds OF THE Metals Beryllium, Magnesium, Aluminium, Calcium, Strontium, Barium, Radium, Thorium, OR OF THE Rare-earth Metals 3

F28D - Heat-exchange Apparatus, NOT Provided FOR IN Another Subclass, IN Which THE Heat-exchange Media DO NOT Come Into Direct Contact 2

F28F - Details OF Heat-exchange AND Heat-transfer Apparatus, OF General Application 2

B23K - Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam 1

B82Y - Specific Uses OR Applications OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Measurement OR Analysis OF NANOSTRUCTURES; Manufacture OR Treatment OF Nanostructures 1

C01P - Indexing Scheme Relating TO Structural AND Physical Aspects OF Solid Inorganic Compounds 1

C01G - Compounds Containing Metals NOT Covered BY Subclasses C01d OR C01f 1

C02F - Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge 1

C01D - Compounds OF Alkali Metals, i.e. Lithium, Sodium, Potassium, Rubidium, Caesium, OR Francium 1

Top 15 of 18 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Scientific Design Company, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Scientific Design Company, Inc.'s lead technology class is C07D (Heterocyclic Compounds), 78.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C07D
Ranked #7,187 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Scientific Design Company, Inc. against Srgi Holdings LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 43.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.