Where does Schwing Bioset, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Schwing Bioset, Inc. ranks #42,835 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Schwing Bioset, Inc. hold?

Schwing Bioset, Inc. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 7 technology areas.

What is Schwing Bioset, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Schwing Bioset, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 48.9 out of 100 (top 16% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Schwing Bioset, Inc. focus on?

Schwing Bioset, Inc.'s top technology area is C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge) with 3 patents, ranking #502 of 1,366 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 7 CPC subclasses total.

Is Schwing Bioset, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Schwing Bioset, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Schwing Bioset, Inc.'s patents?

Schwing Bioset, Inc.'s patents average 21.3 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Schwing Bioset, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Schwing Bioset, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Schwing ranks #42,835 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 7 technology areas.

#42,835
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 16%
by Innovation Score (48.9/100): 21.3
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R42835 · US Corporation #42,835 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #42,835/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Scherdel Innotec…
CPC-NARROW C02F · 7 areas
INNOV-PAR 48.9/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 21.3 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Scherdel Innotec Forschungs- Und Entwicklungs- GmbH (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Schwing’s 48.9 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (14%) Velocity 20.0 pts (41%) Breadth 9.4 pts (19%) Claim depth 12.8 pts (26%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Schwing Bioset · this assignee

49
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Schwing's Innovation Score is 48.9/100 (top 16% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Schwing?

Each dot is one of Schwing’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Schwing’s own 21.3 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Schwing vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Schwing's grants concentrate

Schwing Bioset, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Schwing sits between Scherdel Innotec Forschungs- Und Entwicklungs- GmbH and Sciton, Inc..

Schwing's three-year grant acceleration

Schwing Bioset, Inc. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 0 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Scherdel Innotec…

6
Schiller Sports

6
Schroff Internati…

6
Schwarze Industri…

6
Sciadonics

6
Scidea Research

6
Scion Medical

6
Sciton

6
Schwing Bioset ◀

6

What this shows Schwing holds 6 patents at rank #43,111, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Schwing

By rank, the assignees closest to #43,111 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C02F (Treatment OF Water)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Schwing's primary technology class.

Schwing's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

49 Top 16% higher than 84% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Schwing Bioset, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	16.7%
2016	1	16.7%
2018	1	16.7%
2022	2	33.3%
2023	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Schwing Bioset, Inc. patent most?

C02F - Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge 3

F16B - Devices FOR Fastening OR Securing Constructional Elements OR Machine Parts Together, e.g. Nails, Bolts, Circlips, Clamps, Clips OR WEDGES; Joints OR Jointing 1

F04B - Positive-displacement Machines FOR LIQUIDS; Pumps 1

C05F - Organic Fertilisers NOT Covered BY Subclasses C05b, C05c, e.g. Fertilisers From Waste OR Refuse 1

Y02A - Technologies FOR Adaptation TO Climate Change 1

C05D - Inorganic Fertilisers NOT Covered BY Subclasses C05b, C05C; Fertilisers Producing Carbon Dioxide 1

F26B - Drying Solid Materials OR Objects BY Removing Liquid Therefrom 1

Top 7 of 7 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Schwing Bioset, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Schwing Bioset, Inc.'s lead technology class is C02F (Treatment OF Water, Waste Water, Sewage, OR Sludge), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C02F
Ranked #42,835 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Schwing Bioset, Inc. against Scherdel Innotec Forschungs- Und Entwicklungs- GmbH, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 48.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.