Schiller Grounds Care, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2019. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01B (Soil Working IN Agriculture OR FORESTRY; Parts, Details, OR Accessories OF Agricultural Machines OR Implements, IN General).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Schiller ranks #30,026 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #30,026
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 14th percentile
- by Innovation Score (24.1/100)
- 10.3
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R30026 · US Corporation #30,026 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #30,026/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Sapphire Energy
- CPC-NARROW A01B · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 24.1/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 10.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Sapphire Energy, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Schiller’s 24.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Schiller
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Schiller Grounds Care · this assignee 24
Schiller Grounds Care · this assignee
24 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Schiller's Innovation Score is 24.1/100 (14th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Schiller?
Each dot is one of Schiller’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Schiller’s own 10.3 claims/patent is at or below the 15.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Schiller's grants concentrate
Schiller Grounds Care, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under A01B (Soil Working IN Agriculture OR FORESTRY; Parts, Details, OR Accessories OF Agricultural Machines OR Implements, IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (7 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Schiller sits between Sapphire Energy, Inc. and Scott Archery LLC.
Who files at Schiller's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Sapphire Energy
Sapphire Energy, Inc.
9 patents
- Sapporo Holdings
Sapporo Holdings Limited
9 patents
- Savroc
Savroc Ltd
9 patents
- Scanogen
Scanogen Inc.
9 patents
- Schofield
Schofield Technologies, Inc.
9 patents
- Scholle
Scholle Corporation
9 patents
- Schrödinger
Schrödinger, LLC
9 patents
- Scott Archery
Scott Archery LLC
9 patents
- Schiller Grounds… ◀
Schiller Grounds Care, Inc.
9 patents
What this shows Schiller holds 9 patents at rank #30,136, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Schiller
By rank, the assignees closest to #30,136 in granted patent volume.
- Sapphire Energy, Inc. #30,132 · 9 patents
- Sapporo Holdings Limited #30,133 · 9 patents
- Savroc Ltd #30,134 · 9 patents
- Scanogen Inc. #30,135 · 9 patents
- Schofield Technologies, Inc. #30,137 · 9 patents
- Scholle Corporation #30,138 · 9 patents
- Schrödinger, LLC #30,139 · 9 patents
- Scott Archery LLC #30,140 · 9 patents
Leaders in A01B (Soil Working IN Agriculture OR Forestry)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Schiller's primary technology class.
Schiller's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
24 14th percentile higher than 14% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2018 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2019 | 7 | 77.8% |
Which technologies does Schiller Grounds Care, Inc. patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Schiller Grounds Care, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Schiller Grounds Care, Inc.'s lead technology class is A01B (Soil Working IN Agriculture OR FORESTRY; Parts, Details, OR Accessories OF Agricultural Machines OR Implements, IN General), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01B
- Ranked #30,026 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Schiller Grounds Care, Inc. against Sapphire Energy, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 24.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.