Scanlab GmbH
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 9 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B23K (Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Scanlab ranks #30,024 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 9 patents across 8 technology areas.
- #30,024
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 39%
- by Innovation Score (39.2/100)
- 18.8
- avg claims per patent
- +0%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R30024 · Foreign Corporation #30,024 · 9 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 9 grants
- MID-PACK #30,024/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Sasib S P A
- CPC-NARROW B23K · 8 areas
- INNOV-THIN 39.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-FLAT +0% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Sasib S.P.A. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Scanlab’s 39.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Scanlab
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Scanlab · this assignee
Scanlab · this assignee
39 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Scanlab's Innovation Score is 39.2/100 (top 39% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Scanlab?
Each dot is one of Scanlab’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Scanlab’s own 18.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 16.8 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Scanlab's grants concentrate
Scanlab GmbH is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 44.4% of grants classified under B23K (Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Scanlab sits between Sasib S.P.A. and SD Biosensor, Inc..
Scanlab's three-year grant acceleration
Scanlab GmbH shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 2 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Scanlab's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Sasib S P A
Sasib S.P.A.
9 patents
- Saverone 2014
Saverone 2014 Ltd.
9 patents
- SB Technology
SB Technology, Inc.
9 patents
- SC2N
SC2N
9 patents
- Schott Gemtron
Schott Gemtron Corp.
9 patents
- Sciencons AS
Sciencons AS
9 patents
- Scopio Labs
Scopio Labs Ltd.
9 patents
- SD Biosensor
SD Biosensor, Inc.
9 patents
- Scanlab ◀
Scanlab GmbH
9 patents
What this shows Scanlab holds 9 patents at rank #29,983, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Scanlab
By rank, the assignees closest to #29,983 in granted patent volume.
Leaders in B23K (Soldering OR Unsoldering)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Scanlab's primary technology class.
Scanlab's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
39 Top 39% higher than 61% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2016 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2018 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2020 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2022 | 2 | 22.2% |
| 2023 | 1 | 11.1% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 11.1% |
Which technologies does Scanlab GmbH patent most?
Top 8 of 8 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Scanlab GmbH's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Scanlab GmbH's lead technology class is B23K (Soldering OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; Cladding OR Plating BY Soldering OR WELDING; Cutting BY Applying Heat Locally, e.g. Flame CUTTING; Working BY Laser Beam), 44.4% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B23K
- Ranked #30,024 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Scanlab GmbH against Sasib S.P.A., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 39.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.