Sartorius Stedim North America Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 52 granted patents across 40 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A01N (Preservation OF Bodies OF Humans OR Animals OR Plants OR Parts Thereof ; Biocides, e.g. AS Disinfectants, AS Pesticides OR AS Herbicides ; Pest Repellants OR ATTRACTANTS; Plant Growth Regulators).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Sartorius ranks #6,478 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 52 patents across 40 technology areas.
- #6,478
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 7%
- by Innovation Score (54.8/100)
- 17.9
- avg claims per patent
- +88%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R6478 · US Corporation #6,478 · 52 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-WIDE · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 52 grants
- UPPER-Q #6,478/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Sharp Life Science…
- CPC-WIDE A01N · 40 areas
- INNOV-PAR 54.8/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +88% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Sharp Life Science (EU) Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Sartorius’s 54.8 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Sartorius
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Seco Tools AB · near
Seco Tools AB · near
55 score
- HAI Robotics · near
HAI Robotics · near
55 score
- Sartorius Stedim… · this assignee
Sartorius Stedim… · this assignee
55 score
- Cenovus Energy · near
Cenovus Energy · near
55 score
- Kraton Polymers · near
Kraton Polymers · near
55 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Sartorius's Innovation Score is 54.8/100 (top 7% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Sartorius?
Each dot is one of Sartorius’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Sartorius’s own 17.9 claims/patent is ABOVE the 14.7 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Sartorius's grants concentrate
Sartorius Stedim North America Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 40 CPC subclasses with 25% of grants classified under A01N (Preservation OF Bodies OF Humans OR Animals OR Plants OR Parts Thereof ; Biocides, e.g. AS Disinfectants, AS Pesticides OR AS Herbicides ; Pest Repellants OR ATTRACTANTS; Plant Growth Regulators). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (9 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Sartorius sits between Shenzhen Neewer Technology Co. Ltd and Technology Research Association FOR Future Additive Manufacturing.
Sartorius's three-year grant acceleration
Sartorius Stedim North America Inc. shows 18 grants in 2022–2024 against only 15 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Sartorius's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Shenzhen Neewer T…
Shenzhen Neewer Technology Co. Ltd
52 patents
- Shop VAC
Shop VAC Corporation
52 patents
- Sierra Wireless
Sierra Wireless, Inc.
52 patents
- Soremartec
Soremartec S.A.
52 patents
- Sharp Life Scienc…
Sharp Life Science (EU) Limited
52 patents
- Sun Hydraulics
Sun Hydraulics, LLC
52 patents
- Sutro Biopharma
Sutro Biopharma, Inc.
52 patents
- Technology Resear…
Technology Research Association FOR Future Additive Manufacturing
52 patents
- Sartorius Stedim… ◀
Sartorius Stedim North America Inc.
52 patents
What this shows Sartorius holds 52 patents at rank #6,485, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Sartorius
By rank, the assignees closest to #6,485 in granted patent volume.
- Shenzhen Neewer Technology Co. Ltd #6,481 · 52 patents
- Shop VAC Corporation #6,482 · 52 patents
- Sierra Wireless, Inc. #6,483 · 52 patents
- Soremartec S.A. #6,484 · 52 patents
- Sharp Life Science (EU) Limited #6,486 · 52 patents
- Sun Hydraulics, LLC #6,487 · 52 patents
- Sutro Biopharma, Inc. #6,488 · 52 patents
- Technology Research Association FOR Future Additive Manufacturing #6,489 · 52 patents
Leaders in A01N (Preservation OF Bodies OF Humans OR Animals OR Plants OR…)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Sartorius's primary technology class.
- Basf SE 420 in class
- Syngenta Participations AG 393 in class
- Bayer Cropscience Aktiengesellschaft 378 in class
- DOW Agrosciences LLC 360 in class
- Sumitomo Chemical Company, Limited 306 in class
- Monsanto Technology LLC 284 in class
- Ecolab USA Inc. 230 in class
- Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH 202 in class
Assignees with similar portfolio profiles
Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Sartorius, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A01N (Preservation OF Bodies OF Humans OR Animals OR Plants OR…), Sartorius ranks #93 of 1,216 assignees by patent count in that subclass.
Similar innovation score
Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (55 here).
Similar claim depth
Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (17.9 here).
Sartorius's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
55 Top 7% higher than 93% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 1.9% |
| 2016 | 2 | 3.8% |
| 2017 | 1 | 1.9% |
| 2018 | 9 | 17.3% |
| 2019 | 3 | 5.8% |
| 2020 | 4 | 7.7% |
| 2021 | 8 | 15.4% |
| 2022 | 7 | 13.5% |
| 2023 | 7 | 13.5% |
| 2024 | 4 | 7.7% |
| 2025partial year | 6 | 11.5% |
Which technologies does Sartorius Stedim North America Inc. patent most?
Top 15 of 40 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Sartorius Stedim North America Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Sartorius Stedim North America Inc.'s lead technology class is A01N (Preservation OF Bodies OF Humans OR Animals OR Plants OR Parts Thereof ; Biocides, e.g. AS Disinfectants, AS Pesticides OR AS Herbicides ; Pest Repellants OR ATTRACTANTS; Plant Growth Regulators), 25% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A01N
- Ranked #6,478 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Sartorius Stedim North America Inc. against Shenzhen Neewer Technology Co. Ltd, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 54.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.