RobotArmy Corporation
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A42B (HATS; Head Coverings).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Robotarmy ranks #37,266 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #37,266
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 27%
- by Innovation Score (43.7/100)
- 13.1
- avg claims per patent
- +300%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R37266 · US Corporation #37,266 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #37,266/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Robbins
- CPC-NARROW A42B · 6 areas
- INNOV-PAR 43.7/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 13.1 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +300% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Robbins, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Robotarmy’s 43.7 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Robotarmy
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- RobotArmy · this assignee
RobotArmy · this assignee
44 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Robotarmy's Innovation Score is 43.7/100 (top 27% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Robotarmy?
Each dot is one of Robotarmy’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Robotarmy’s own 13.1 claims/patent is at or below the 19.6 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Robotarmy's grants concentrate
RobotArmy Corporation is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 57.1% of grants classified under A42B (HATS; Head Coverings). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Robotarmy sits between Robbins, Inc. and Rogue Fabrication, LLC.
Robotarmy's three-year grant acceleration
RobotArmy Corporation shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at RobotArmy's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Robbins
Robbins, Inc.
7 patents
- Robert Bosch Heal…
Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc.
7 patents
- Robert Bosch Powe…
Robert Bosch Power Tools GmbH
7 patents
- Robert T and Virg…
Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins as Trustees of the Jenkins Family Trust Dated Feb. 8, 2002
7 patents
- Rocket Fuel
Rocket Fuel Inc.
7 patents
- Rocketick
Rocketick Technologies Ltd
7 patents
- Rocktape
Rocktape, Inc.
7 patents
- Rogue Fabrication
Rogue Fabrication, LLC
7 patents
- Robotarmy ◀
RobotArmy Corporation
7 patents
What this shows RobotArmy holds 7 patents at rank #37,255, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near RobotArmy
By rank, the assignees closest to #37,255 in granted patent volume.
- Robbins, Inc. #37,251 · 7 patents
- Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc. #37,252 · 7 patents
- Robert Bosch Power Tools GmbH #37,253 · 7 patents
- Robert T. and Virginia T. Jenkins as Trustees of the Jenkins Family Trust Dated Feb. 8, 2002 #37,254 · 7 patents
- Rocket Fuel Inc. #37,256 · 7 patents
- Rocketick Technologies Ltd #37,257 · 7 patents
- Rocktape, Inc. #37,258 · 7 patents
- Rogue Fabrication, LLC #37,259 · 7 patents
Leaders in A42B (HATS)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in RobotArmy's primary technology class.
Robotarmy's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
44 Top 27% higher than 73% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2020 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2023 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2024 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2025partial year | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does RobotArmy Corporation patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
RobotArmy Corporation's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- RobotArmy Corporation's lead technology class is A42B (HATS; Head Coverings), 57.1% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A42B
- Ranked #37,266 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare RobotArmy Corporation against Robbins, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 43.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.