Overall rank by patents
#16,314
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 24 technology areas, active 2017–2025. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: F24H (FLUID HEATERS, e.g. WATER OR AIR HEATERS, HAVING HEAT-GENERATING MEANS, e.g. HEAT PUMPS, IN GENERAL).
The verdict
Rheem holds 18 US patents across 24 technology areas, rank #16,314 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
Rheem Australia PTY Limited has been granted 18 US utility patents between 2017 and 2025, placing Rheem Australia PTY Limited at rank #16,314 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 24 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.4 claims per patent with primary concentration in F24H (FLUID HEATERS, e.g. WATER OR AIR HEATERS, HAVING HEAT-GENERATING MEANS, e.g. HEAT PUMPS, IN GENERAL). As a Foreign Corporation, Rheem Australia PTY Limited is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Rheem sits between Recovery Force, Llc (18 patents, rank #16,310) and Roof Systems Germany Gmbh (18 patents, rank #16,318) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 45.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 14 grants, compared with 4 in the 2015–2019 window, a +250% shift in five-year velocity. An acceleration of this magnitude signals aggressive R&D investment and expanding technical ambition. The Foreign Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Rheem Australia PTY Limited's 15.4 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while a multi-domain presence across 24 subclasses balances depth with breadth. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Rheem Australia PTY Limited against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
Recovery Force, LLC
18 patents
RedCritter Corp.
18 patents
Rennovia Inc.
18 patents
Research Corporation Technologies, Inc.
18 patents
Rheon Automatic Machinery Co., Ltd.
18 patents
Rhythmia Medical Inc.
18 patents
Ripcord Inc.
18 patents
Roof Systems Germany GmbH
18 patents
Rheem Australia PTY Limited
18 patents
What this shows Rheem holds 18 patents at rank #16,314, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #16,314 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rheem's primary technology class.
Rheem's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
46 Top 23% higher than 77% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 | 5.6% |
| 2018 | 2 | 11.1% |
| 2019 | 1 | 5.6% |
| 2020 | 2 | 11.1% |
| 2021 | 3 | 16.7% |
| 2022 | 2 | 11.1% |
| 2023 | 2 | 11.1% |
| 2024 | 4 | 22.2% |
| 2025 | 1 | 5.6% |
Top 15 of 24 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#16,314
Across all tracked assignees
45.6 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
Rheem's 18 grants land it in the top 23% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.