Where does RedCritter Corp. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), RedCritter Corp. ranks #16,308 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does RedCritter Corp. hold?

RedCritter Corp. holds 18 US utility patents granted between 2015 and 2023, spanning 9 technology areas.

What is RedCritter Corp.'s Innovation Score?

RedCritter Corp. has an Innovation Score of 33.1 out of 100 (43rd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does RedCritter Corp. focus on?

RedCritter Corp.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 4 patents, ranking #7,209 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 9 CPC subclasses total.

Is RedCritter Corp.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

RedCritter Corp.'s recent grant velocity is -62% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). Grant activity has slowed relative to earlier years.

What does claim depth mean for RedCritter Corp.'s patents?

RedCritter Corp.'s patents average 13.9 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the RedCritter Corp. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

RedCritter Corp.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 18 granted patents across 9 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Redcritter ranks #16,308 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 18 patents across 9 technology areas.

#16,308
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 43rd percentile
by Innovation Score (33.1/100): 13.9
avg claims per patent: -62%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R16308 · US Corporation #16,308 · 18 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 18 grants
MID-PACK #16,308/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Recovery Force
CPC-NARROW G06F · 9 areas
INNOV-THIN 33.1/100
CLAIMS-RICH 13.9 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-DROP -62% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Recovery Force, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Redcritter’s 33.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 10.2 pts (31%) Velocity 4.0 pts (12%) Breadth 10.6 pts (32%) Claim depth 8.3 pts (25%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
RedCritter · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Redcritter's Innovation Score is 33.1/100 (43rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Redcritter?

Each dot is one of Redcritter’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Redcritter’s own 13.9 claims/patent is at or below the 15.4 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Redcritter vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Redcritter's grants concentrate

RedCritter Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 9 CPC subclasses with 22.2% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2017 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Redcritter sits between Reshape Lifesciences Inc. and Rheon Automatic Machinery Co., Ltd..

Redcritter's three-year grant acceleration

RedCritter Corp. shows 3 grants in 2022–2024 against only 5 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Reshape Lifescien…

18
RTM Vital Signs

18
Ruizhang Technolo…

18
Recovery Force

18
Rennovia

18
Research

18
Rheem Australia P…

18
Rheon Automatic M…

18
Redcritter ◀

18

What this shows RedCritter holds 18 patents at rank #16,311, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near RedCritter

By rank, the assignees closest to #16,311 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in RedCritter's primary technology class.

Redcritter's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 43rd percentile higher than 43% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

RedCritter Corp. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2015	1	5.6%
2016	1	5.6%
2017	4	22.2%
2018	4	22.2%
2019	3	16.7%
2020	2	11.1%
2022	2	11.1%
2023	1	5.6%

Which technologies does RedCritter Corp. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 4

G06Q - Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory PURPOSES; Systems OR Methods Specially Adapted FOR Administrative, Commercial, Financial, Managerial OR Supervisory Purposes, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR 4

G09B - Educational OR Demonstration APPLIANCES; Appliances FOR Teaching, OR Communicating With, THE Blind, Deaf OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; Diagrams 3

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 3

H04N - Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television 3

G08B - Signalling OR Calling SYSTEMS; Order TELEGRAPHS; Alarm Systems 2

H04W - Wireless Communication Networks 2

H04M - Telephonic Communication 1

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 1

Top 9 of 9 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

RedCritter Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

RedCritter Corp.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 22.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #16,308 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare RedCritter Corp. against Reshape Lifesciences Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 33.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.