Where does Restone AS rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Restone AS ranks #49,979 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Restone AS hold?

Restone AS holds 5 US utility patents granted between 2020 and 2022, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Restone AS's Innovation Score?

Restone AS has an Innovation Score of 26.0 out of 100 (19th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Restone AS's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Insufficient historical data is available to calculate a velocity trend for Restone AS.

What does claim depth mean for Restone AS's patents?

Restone AS's patents average 18.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Restone AS patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Restone AS

Q: What technology areas does Restone AS focus on?

Restone AS's top technology area is C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone) with 4 patents, ranking #320 of 1,052 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2020–2022. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Restone ranks #49,979 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 4 technology areas.

#49,979
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 19th percentile
by Innovation Score (26.0/100): 18.4
avg claims per patent

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R49979 · Foreign Corporation #49,979 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH

GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
BOTTOM-DECILE #49,979/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Research Institute…
CPC-NARROW C04B · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 26.0/100
CLAIMS-RICH 18.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
SPAN-YRS 2020–2022 · 3y
BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Research Institute OF Petroleum Industry (RIPI) (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Restone’s 26.0 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.2 pts (24%) Velocity 1.7 pts (7%) Breadth 7.1 pts (27%) Claim depth 11.0 pts (42%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Restone AS · this assignee

26
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Restone's Innovation Score is 26.0/100 (19th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Restone?

Each dot is one of Restone’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Restone’s own 18.4 claims/patent is ABOVE the 17.2 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Restone vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Restone's grants concentrate

Restone AS is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Restone sits between Research Institute OF Petroleum Industry (RIPI) and Revolutionary Plastics, LLC.

Restone's three-year grant acceleration

Restone AS shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Research Institut…

5
Resonance Compani…

5
Responsible Energy

5
Responsys

5
Reveal Biosensors

5
Reviral

5
Reviv Global

5
Revolutionary Pla…

5
Restone AS ◀

5

What this shows Restone holds 5 patents at rank #49,983, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Restone

By rank, the assignees closest to #49,983 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in C04B (Lime)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Restone's primary technology class.

Restone's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

26 19th percentile higher than 19% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2020–2022

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2020–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Restone AS patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2020	1	20.0%
2021	3	60.0%
2022	1	20.0%

Which technologies does Restone AS patent most?

C04B - Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone 4

C09K - Materials FOR Miscellaneous Applications, NOT Provided FOR Elsewhere 2

Y02P - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies IN THE Production OR Processing OF Goods 1

G01N - Investigating OR Analysing Materials BY Determining Their Chemical OR Physical Properties 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Restone AS's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Restone AS's lead technology class is C04B (Lime, MAGNESIA; SLAG; CEMENTS; Compositions Thereof, e.g. Mortars, Concrete OR Like Building MATERIALS; Artificial Stone ; Ceramics ; REFRACTORIES; Treatment OF Natural Stone), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore C04B
Ranked #49,979 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Restone AS against Research Institute OF Petroleum Industry (RIPI), an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 26.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.