USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Reddress Ltd.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Reddress ranks #42,606 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 6 technology areas.

#42,606
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
9th percentile
by Innovation Score (21.6/100)
10.3
avg claims per patent
-100%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R42606 · Foreign Corporation #42,606 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
  • LOWER-Q #42,606/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Recovery Science
  • CPC-NARROW A61K · 6 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 21.6/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 10.3 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -100% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Recovery Science LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Reddress’s 21.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Reddress

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Reddress's Innovation Score is 21.6/100 (9th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Reddress?

Each dot is one of Reddress’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Reddress’s own 10.3 claims/patent is at or below the 16.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Reddress vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 5.96.06.066.06.06.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Recovery Science LLC - 6, 17.17Recovery ScienceRecticel Automobilsysteme GMBH - 6, 15.33Recticel Automobi…RED OAX Holdings, LLC - 6, 20.17RED OAX HoldingsRED River TEA Company - 6, 18.17RED River TEARedflex Traffic Systems PTY Ltd. - 6, 14.5Redflex Traffic S…Reflection Window Company, LLC - 6, 23.67Reflection WindowRegenerative Research Foundation - 6, 15.17Regenerative Rese…Regina Catene Calibrate S.P.A. - 6, 16.67Regina Catene Cal…Reddress Ltd. - 6, 10.33Reddress
Reddress vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Reddress's grants concentrate

Reddress Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 83.3% of grants classified under A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes). By volume, Reddress sits between Recovery Science LLC and Regina Catene Calibrate S.P.A..

Who files at Reddress's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Reddress holds 6 patents at rank #42,550, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Reddress

By rank, the assignees closest to #42,550 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61K (Preparations FOR Medical)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Reddress's primary technology class.

Reddress's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 9th percentile higher than 9% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 201520182025 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Reddress Ltd. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 16.7%
2018 1 16.7%
2025partial year 4 66.7%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Reddress Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Reddress Ltd.'s lead technology class is A61K (Preparations FOR Medical, Dental OR Toiletry Purposes), 83.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61K
  • Ranked #42,606 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Reddress Ltd. against Recovery Science LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 21.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.