Where does RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. ranks #20,307 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. hold?

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. holds 14 US utility patents granted between 2016 and 2024, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 32.6 out of 100 (42nd percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. focus on?

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc.'s top technology area is A43B (Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear) with 7 patents, ranking #48 of 317 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +33% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc.'s patents?

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc.'s patents average 6.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 14 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2024. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A43B (Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, RED ranks #20,307 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 14 patents across 3 technology areas.

#20,307
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 42nd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.6/100): 6.4
avg claims per patent: +33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R20307 · US Corporation #20,307 · 14 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 14 grants
MID-PACK #20,307/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH RAM Medical…
CPC-NARROW A43B · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 32.6/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 6.4 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-UP +33% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: RAM Medical Innovations, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How RED’s 32.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 9.4 pts (29%) Velocity 13.3 pts (41%) Breadth 6.1 pts (19%) Claim depth 3.8 pts (12%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
RED Wing Shoe · this assignee

33
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows RED's Innovation Score is 32.6/100 (42nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for RED?

Each dot is one of RED’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). RED’s own 6.4 claims/patent is at or below the 17.5 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

RED vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where RED's grants concentrate

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under A43B (Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, RED sits between RAM Medical Innovations, Inc. and Restaurant Technology Inc..

RED's three-year grant acceleration

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. shows 6 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

RAM Medical Innov…

14
Rapid Micro Biosy…

14
Rebo Lighting &

14
RED SIX Aerospace

14
Remedy Robotics

14
Renata

14
Renson Sunprotect…

14
Restaurant Techno…

14
RED Wing Shoe ◀

14

What this shows RED holds 14 patents at rank #20,298, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near RED

By rank, the assignees closest to #20,298 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A43B (Characteristic Features OF Footwear)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in RED's primary technology class.

RED's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2024

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2016	3	21.4%
2017	2	14.3%
2019	1	7.1%
2021	2	14.3%
2022	1	7.1%
2023	3	21.4%
2024	2	14.3%

Which technologies does RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. patent most?

A43B - Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear 7

A43C - Fastenings OR Attachments OF FOOTWEAR; Laces IN General 2

B29D - Producing Particular Articles From Plastics OR From Substances IN A Plastic State 1

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc.'s lead technology class is A43B (Characteristic Features OF FOOTWEAR; Parts OF Footwear), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A43B
Ranked #20,307 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare RED Wing Shoe Company, Inc. against RAM Medical Innovations, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 32.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.