Red Valve Company, Inc.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Red ranks #42,605 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 11 technology areas.
- #42,605
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 29th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.9/100)
- 17.3
- avg claims per patent
- +300%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R42605 · US Corporation #42,605 · 6 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
- LOWER-Q #42,605/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH RealBio
- CPC-FOCUS F16K · 11 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.9/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 17.3 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-SURGE +300% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: RealBio Technologies Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Red’s 28.9 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Red
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Red Valve · this assignee 29
Red Valve · this assignee
29 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Red's Innovation Score is 28.9/100 (29th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Red?
Each dot is one of Red’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Red’s own 17.3 claims/patent is at or below the 18.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Red's grants concentrate
Red Valve Company, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (4 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Red sits between RealBio Technologies Ltd. and Reend Spolka z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia.
Who files at Red's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Realbio
RealBio Technologies Ltd.
6 patents
- Recognition Conce…
Recognition Concepts, Inc.
6 patents
- Recreation Supply
Recreation Supply, Inc.
6 patents
- Red Devil
Red Devil, Inc.
6 patents
- Redfast
Redfast, Inc.
6 patents
- Redis
Redis Ltd.
6 patents
- Redshift Sports
Redshift Sports, LLC
6 patents
- Reend Spolka z Og…
Reend Spolka z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia
6 patents
- Red Valve ◀
Red Valve Company, Inc.
6 patents
What this shows Red holds 6 patents at rank #42,644, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Red
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,644 in granted patent volume.
- RealBio Technologies Ltd. #42,640 · 6 patents
- Recognition Concepts, Inc. #42,641 · 6 patents
- Recreation Supply, Inc. #42,642 · 6 patents
- Red Devil, Inc. #42,643 · 6 patents
- Redfast, Inc. #42,645 · 6 patents
- Redis Ltd. #42,646 · 6 patents
- Redshift Sports, LLC #42,647 · 6 patents
- Reend Spolka z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia #42,648 · 6 patents
Leaders in F16K (Valves)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Red's primary technology class.
- Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation (HSC) 309 in class
- Fisher Controls International LLC 309 in class
- Fujikin Incorporated 153 in class
- Cameron International Corporation 136 in class
- Emerson Process Management Regulator Technologies, Inc. 129 in class
- Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. 123 in class
- Mueller International, LLC 110 in class
- Kohler Co. 103 in class
Red's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
29 29th percentile higher than 29% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2020 | 4 | 66.7% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 16.7% |
Which technologies does Red Valve Company, Inc. patent most?
Top 11 of 11 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Red Valve Company, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Red Valve Company, Inc.'s lead technology class is F16K (VALVES; TAPS; COCKS; ACTUATING-FLOATS; Devices FOR Venting OR Aerating), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F16K
- Ranked #42,605 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Red Valve Company, Inc. against RealBio Technologies Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.9/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.