RED Bend Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 23 granted patents across 14 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, RED ranks #13,127 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 23 patents across 14 technology areas.
- #13,127
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 12%
- by Innovation Score (51.2/100)
- 19.0
- avg claims per patent
- +900%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R13127 · Foreign Corporation #13,127 · 23 grants
GRANTS-SMALL · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-SMALL 23 grants
- MID-PACK #13,127/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Quake Global
- CPC-FOCUS G06F · 14 areas
- INNOV-PAR 51.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 19.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-SURGE +900% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Quake Global, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How RED’s 51.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around RED
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- RED Bend · this assignee
RED Bend · this assignee
51 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows RED's Innovation Score is 51.2/100 (top 12% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for RED?
Each dot is one of RED’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). RED’s own 19.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where RED's grants concentrate
RED Bend Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 14 CPC subclasses with 65.2% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2024 (6 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, RED sits between Quanterix Corporation and Rekon, LLC.
RED's three-year grant acceleration
RED Bend Ltd. shows 14 grants in 2022–2024 against only 6 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at RED's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Quanterix
Quanterix Corporation
23 patents
- Quake Global
Quake Global, Inc.
23 patents
- Ratier Figeac
Ratier Figeac
23 patents
- Rattunde
Rattunde AG
23 patents
- Rexam Beverage CAN
Rexam Beverage CAN Company
23 patents
- Rfhic
Rfhic Corporation
23 patents
- Rapiddeploy
RapidDeploy, Inc.
23 patents
- Rekon
Rekon, LLC
23 patents
- RED Bend ◀
RED Bend Ltd.
23 patents
What this shows RED holds 23 patents at rank #13,120, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near RED
By rank, the assignees closest to #13,120 in granted patent volume.
- Quanterix Corporation #13,116 · 23 patents
- Quake Global, Inc. #13,117 · 23 patents
- Ratier Figeac #13,118 · 23 patents
- Rattunde AG #13,119 · 23 patents
- Rexam Beverage CAN Company #13,121 · 23 patents
- Rfhic Corporation #13,122 · 23 patents
- RapidDeploy, Inc. #13,123 · 23 patents
- Rekon, LLC #13,124 · 23 patents
Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in RED's primary technology class.
- International Business Machines Corporation 42,717 in class
- Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 21,497 in class
- Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC 16,951 in class
- Google LLC 13,092 in class
- Intel Corporation 12,803 in class
- Apple Inc. 11,007 in class
- Amazon Technologies, Inc. 10,217 in class
- Dell Products L.P. 7,187 in class
RED's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
51 Top 12% higher than 88% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 4.3% |
| 2017 | 1 | 4.3% |
| 2020 | 2 | 8.7% |
| 2021 | 4 | 17.4% |
| 2022 | 3 | 13.0% |
| 2023 | 5 | 21.7% |
| 2024 | 6 | 26.1% |
| 2025partial year | 1 | 4.3% |
Which technologies does RED Bend Ltd. patent most?
Top 14 of 14 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
RED Bend Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- RED Bend Ltd.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 65.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
- Ranked #13,127 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare RED Bend Ltd. against Quanterix Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 51.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.