RE Factor Tactical, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, RE ranks #49,946 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #49,946
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 3rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (16.1/100)
- 8.2
- avg claims per patent
- -33%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49946 · US Corporation #49,946 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,946/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Rayz
- CPC-NARROW G09F · 2 areas
- INNOV-LOW 16.1/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 8.2 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DOWN -33% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How RE’s 16.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around RE
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- RE Factor Tactical · this assignee 16
RE Factor Tactical · this assignee
16 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows RE's Innovation Score is 16.1/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for RE?
Each dot is one of RE’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). RE’s own 8.2 claims/patent is at or below the 16.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where RE's grants concentrate
RE Factor Tactical, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 20% of grants classified under G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, RE sits between Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd. and Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited.
Who files at RE's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Rayz
Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd.
5 patents
- Rbkpark
Rbkpark LLC
5 patents
- RC Medical
RC Medical LLC
5 patents
- RDG Holdings
RDG Holdings, Inc.
5 patents
- RE Mago
RE Mago Ltd
5 patents
- REA Innovations
REA Innovations, Inc.
5 patents
- Realyagu Zone
Realyagu Zone Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Reckitt Benckiser…
Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited
5 patents
- RE Factor Tactical ◀
RE Factor Tactical, LLC
5 patents
What this shows RE holds 5 patents at rank #49,951, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near RE
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,951 in granted patent volume.
- Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd. #49,947 · 5 patents
- Rbkpark LLC #49,948 · 5 patents
- RC Medical LLC #49,949 · 5 patents
- RDG Holdings, Inc. #49,950 · 5 patents
- RE Mago Ltd #49,952 · 5 patents
- REA Innovations, Inc. #49,953 · 5 patents
- Realyagu Zone Co., Ltd. #49,954 · 5 patents
- Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited #49,955 · 5 patents
Leaders in G09F (Displaying)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in RE's primary technology class.
- BOE Technology Group Co., Ltd. 621 in class
- Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha 467 in class
- Japan Display Inc. 305 in class
- LG Display Co., Ltd. 268 in class
- Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. 249 in class
- Wuhan China Star Optoelectronics Semiconductor Display Technology Co., Ltd. 183 in class
- Chengdu BOE Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. 152 in class
- Sakai Display Products Corporation 97 in class
RE's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
16 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 3 | 60.0% |
| 2020 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does RE Factor Tactical, LLC patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
RE Factor Tactical, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- RE Factor Tactical, LLC's lead technology class is G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals), 20% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G09F
- Ranked #49,946 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare RE Factor Tactical, LLC against Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 16.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.