USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

RE Factor Tactical, LLC

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2020. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, RE ranks #49,946 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 2 technology areas.

#49,946
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
3rd percentile
by Innovation Score (16.1/100)
8.2
avg claims per patent
-33%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R49946 · US Corporation #49,946 · 5 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DOWN · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
  • BOTTOM-DECILE #49,946/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Rayz
  • CPC-NARROW G09F · 2 areas
  • INNOV-LOW 16.1/100
  • CLAIMS-PAR 8.2 claims/avg
  • TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
  • VEL-DOWN -33% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How RE’s 16.1 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around RE

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows RE's Innovation Score is 16.1/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for RE?

Each dot is one of RE’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). RE’s own 8.2 claims/patent is at or below the 16.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

RE vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 4.95.05.055.05.05.1 510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd. - 5, 16RayzRbkpark LLC - 5, 18RbkparkRC Medical LLC - 5, 12.4RC MedicalRDG Holdings, Inc. - 5, 18.4RDG HoldingsRE Mago Ltd - 5, 23.4RE MagoREA Innovations, Inc. - 5, 15.6REA InnovationsRealyagu Zone Co., Ltd. - 5, 12Realyagu ZoneReckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited - 5, 16.2Reckitt Benckiser…RE Factor Tactical, LLC - 5, 8.2RE Factor Tactical
RE vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where RE's grants concentrate

RE Factor Tactical, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 20% of grants classified under G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (3 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2020. By volume, RE sits between Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd. and Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited.

Who files at RE's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows RE holds 5 patents at rank #49,951, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near RE

By rank, the assignees closest to #49,951 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G09F (Displaying)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in RE's primary technology class.

RE's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

16 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

1.522.533.5 20192020 2
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2020

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
RE Factor Tactical, LLC patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2019 3 60.0%
2020 2 40.0%

Which technologies does RE Factor Tactical, LLC patent most?

Top 2 of 2 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

RE Factor Tactical, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • RE Factor Tactical, LLC's lead technology class is G09F (DISPLAYING; ADVERTISING; SIGNS; Labels OR NAME-PLATES; Seals), 20% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G09F
  • Ranked #49,946 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare RE Factor Tactical, LLC against Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 16.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.