Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 5 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2021–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Rayz ranks #49,942 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 5 patents across 6 technology areas.
- #49,942
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- Top 26%
- by Innovation Score (44.5/100)
- 16.0
- avg claims per patent
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R49942 · Foreign Corporation #49,942 · 5 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · BOTTOM-DECILE · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · SPAN-YRS · BOOK-RICH
- GRANTS-MICRO 5 grants
- BOTTOM-DECILE #49,942/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Ravas Europe B V
- CPC-NARROW H04N · 6 areas
- INNOV-PAR 44.5/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 16.0 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- SPAN-YRS 2021–2023 · 3y
- BOOK-RICH 9/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Ravas Europe B.V. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Rayz’s 44.5 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Rayz
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Rayz · this assignee
Rayz · this assignee
44 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Rayz's Innovation Score is 44.5/100 (top 26% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Rayz?
Each dot is one of Rayz’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Rayz’s own 16.0 claims/patent is ABOVE the 13.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Rayz's grants concentrate
Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 80% of grants classified under H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television). Peak complete grant year is 2022 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2021. By volume, Rayz sits between Ravas Europe B.V. and RE Factor Tactical, LLC.
Rayz's three-year grant acceleration
Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd. shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 1 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.
Who files at Rayz's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ravas Europe B V
Ravas Europe B.V.
5 patents
- Ravenbrick
Ravenbrick LLC
5 patents
- Raycap Intellectu…
Raycap Intellectual Property Ltd.
5 patents
- Raytron
Raytron Co., Ltd.
5 patents
- Rbkpark
Rbkpark LLC
5 patents
- RC Medical
RC Medical LLC
5 patents
- RDG Holdings
RDG Holdings, Inc.
5 patents
- RE Factor Tactical
RE Factor Tactical, LLC
5 patents
- Rayz ◀
Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd.
5 patents
What this shows Rayz holds 5 patents at rank #49,947, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Rayz
By rank, the assignees closest to #49,947 in granted patent volume.
- Ravas Europe B.V. #49,943 · 5 patents
- Ravenbrick LLC #49,944 · 5 patents
- Raycap Intellectual Property Ltd. #49,945 · 5 patents
- Raytron Co., Ltd. #49,946 · 5 patents
- Rbkpark LLC #49,948 · 5 patents
- RC Medical LLC #49,949 · 5 patents
- RDG Holdings, Inc. #49,950 · 5 patents
- RE Factor Tactical, LLC #49,951 · 5 patents
Leaders in H04N (Pictorial Communication)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rayz's primary technology class.
Rayz's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
44 Top 26% higher than 74% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2021–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1 | 20.0% |
| 2022 | 2 | 40.0% |
| 2023 | 2 | 40.0% |
Which technologies does Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd. patent most?
Top 6 of 6 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd.'s lead technology class is H04N (Pictorial Communication, e.g. Television), 80% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore H04N
- Ranked #49,942 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Rayz Technologies Co. Ltd. against Ravas Europe B.V., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 44.5/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.