Overall rank by patents
#42,542
Across all tracked assignees
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, active 2015–2018. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: G06Q (INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE,).
The verdict
RDM holds 6 US patents across 4 technology areas, rank #42,542 of 50,000 tracked assignees.
RDM Corporation has been granted 6 US utility patents between 2015 and 2018, placing RDM Corporation at rank #42,542 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 4 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 21.2 claims per patent with primary concentration in G06Q (INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE,). As a US Corporation, RDM Corporation is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, RDM sits between Rassini Frenos, S.a. DE C.v. (6 patents, rank #42,538) and Recovery Science Llc (6 patents, rank #42,546) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 26.5/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.
Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 6 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.
Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. RDM Corporation's 21.2 average claims per patent reflects complex, broadly scoped inventions that are difficult for competitors to design around, while specialization in 4 subclasses reflects a tightly scoped invention area. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark RDM Corporation against peers pursuing similar technology classes.
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
RASSINI FRENOS, S.A. DE C.V.
6 patents
RAVE LLC
6 patents
RAYMOR INDUSTRIES INC.
6 patents
RCF S.P.A.
6 patents
READY GRIP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
6 patents
RECKITT BENCKISER HEALTHCARE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
6 patents
RECKITT BENCKISER LAUNDRY DETERGENTS (NO. 1) BV
6 patents
RECOVERY SCIENCE LLC
6 patents
RDM Corporation
6 patents
What this shows RDM holds 6 patents at rank #42,542, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
By rank, the assignees closest to #42,542 in granted patent volume.
Other assignees with the most granted patents in RDM's primary technology class.
RDM's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
26 Top 80% higher than 20% of 50,000 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 3 | 50.0% |
| 2016 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2017 | 1 | 16.7% |
| 2018 | 1 | 16.7% |
Top 4 of 4 technology areas
Overall rank by patents
#42,542
Across all tracked assignees
26.5 out of 100
How to use this portfolio
RDM's 6 grants land it in the top 80% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.
Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.