Rapid Pure Inc
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 10 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A47G (Household OR Table Equipment).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Rapid ranks #27,236 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 10 patents across 3 technology areas.
- #27,236
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 3rd percentile
- by Innovation Score (16.1/100)
- 2.9
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R27236 · US Corporation #27,236 · 10 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 10 grants
- MID-PACK #27,236/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Rammer
- CPC-NARROW A47G · 3 areas
- INNOV-LOW 16.1/100
- CLAIMS-SPARSE 2.9 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Rammer Technologies, Inc. (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Rapid’s 16.1 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Rapid
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Rapid Pure · this assignee 16
Rapid Pure · this assignee
16 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Rapid's Innovation Score is 16.1/100 (3rd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Rapid?
Each dot is one of Rapid’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Rapid’s own 2.9 claims/patent is at or below the 17.8 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Rapid's grants concentrate
Rapid Pure Inc is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 10% of grants classified under A47G (Household OR Table Equipment). Peak complete grant year is 2016 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Rapid sits between Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd. and Real-Time Innovations, Inc..
Who files at Rapid's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Ruijie Networks
Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd.
10 patents
- RVL Pharmaceutica…
RVL Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
10 patents
- Rammer
Rammer Technologies, Inc.
10 patents
- Ramsey Winch
Ramsey Winch Company
10 patents
- Rayprus Technolog…
Rayprus Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd.
10 patents
- Raytheon Cyber Pr…
Raytheon Cyber Products, LLC
10 patents
- Reaction Engines
Reaction Engines Ltd.
10 patents
- Real-time Innovat…
Real-Time Innovations, Inc.
10 patents
- Rapid Pure ◀
Rapid Pure Inc
10 patents
What this shows Rapid holds 10 patents at rank #27,253, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Rapid
By rank, the assignees closest to #27,253 in granted patent volume.
- Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd. #27,249 · 10 patents
- RVL Pharmaceuticals, Inc. #27,250 · 10 patents
- Rammer Technologies, Inc. #27,251 · 10 patents
- Ramsey Winch Company #27,252 · 10 patents
- Rayprus Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. #27,254 · 10 patents
- Raytheon Cyber Products, LLC #27,255 · 10 patents
- Reaction Engines Ltd. #27,256 · 10 patents
- Real-Time Innovations, Inc. #27,257 · 10 patents
Leaders in A47G (Household OR Table Equipment)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rapid's primary technology class.
Rapid's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
16 3rd percentile higher than 3% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2016 | 5 | 50.0% |
| 2017 | 1 | 10.0% |
| 2018 | 3 | 30.0% |
Which technologies does Rapid Pure Inc patent most?
Top 3 of 3 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Rapid Pure Inc's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Rapid Pure Inc's lead technology class is A47G (Household OR Table Equipment), 10% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A47G
- Ranked #27,236 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Rapid Pure Inc against Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 16.1/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.