Where does Rapid Granulator AB rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Rapid Granulator AB ranks #42,572 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Rapid Granulator AB hold?

Rapid Granulator AB holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2025, spanning 3 technology areas.

What is Rapid Granulator AB's Innovation Score?

Rapid Granulator AB has an Innovation Score of 20.4 out of 100 (7th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Rapid Granulator AB focus on?

Rapid Granulator AB's top technology area is B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain) with 3 patents, ranking #116 of 384 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 3 CPC subclasses total.

Is Rapid Granulator AB's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Rapid Granulator AB's recent grant velocity is +300% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Rapid Granulator AB's patents?

Rapid Granulator AB's patents average 5.2 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Rapid Granulator AB patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Rapid Granulator AB

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 3 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Rapid ranks #42,572 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 3 technology areas.

#42,572
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 7th percentile
by Innovation Score (20.4/100): 5.2
avg claims per patent: +300%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R42572 · Foreign Corporation #42,572 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-SPARSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #42,572/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Radiant Vision Systems
CPC-NARROW B02C · 3 areas
INNOV-THIN 20.4/100
CLAIMS-SPARSE 5.2 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +300% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Radiant Vision Systems, LLC (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Rapid’s 20.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (33%) Velocity 4.4 pts (22%) Breadth 6.1 pts (30%) Claim depth 3.1 pts (15%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Rapid Granulator AB · this assignee

20
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Rapid's Innovation Score is 20.4/100 (7th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Rapid?

Each dot is one of Rapid’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Rapid’s own 5.2 claims/patent is at or below the 11.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Rapid vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Rapid's grants concentrate

Rapid Granulator AB is a focused PatentsView assignee: 3 CPC subclasses with 50% of grants classified under B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain). Peak complete grant year is 2021 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Rapid sits between Radiant Vision Systems, LLC and RCF S.P.A..

Rapid's three-year grant acceleration

Rapid Granulator AB shows 2 grants in 2022–2024 against only 3 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Radiant Vision Sy…

6
Radisens Diagnost…

6
RAM Group

6
Ramun Korea

6
Rassini Frenos DE…

6
Rave

6
Raymor Industries

6
RCF S P A

6
Rapid Granulator… ◀

6

What this shows Rapid holds 6 patents at rank #42,537, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Rapid

By rank, the assignees closest to #42,537 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B02C (Crushing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Rapid's primary technology class.

Rapid's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

20 7th percentile higher than 7% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Rapid Granulator AB patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	16.7%
2021	2	33.3%
2022	1	16.7%
2023	1	16.7%
2025partial year	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Rapid Granulator AB patent most?

B02C - Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain 3

B29B - Preparation OR Pretreatment OF THE Material TO BE SHAPED; Making Granules OR PREFORMS; Recovery OF Plastics OR Other Constituents OF Waste Material Containing Plastics 3

Y02W - Climate Change Mitigation Technologies Related TO Wastewater Treatment OR Waste Management 2

Top 3 of 3 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Rapid Granulator AB's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Rapid Granulator AB's lead technology class is B02C (Crushing, Pulverising, OR Disintegrating IN GENERAL; Milling Grain), 50% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B02C
Ranked #42,572 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Rapid Granulator AB against Radiant Vision Systems, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 20.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.