Radar Leather Division S.R.L.
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 2 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F41C (Smallarms, e.g. Pistols, Rifles ; Accessories Therefor).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Radar ranks #37,156 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 2 technology areas.
- #37,156
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 5th percentile
- by Innovation Score (18.0/100)
- 9.7
- avg claims per patent
- -60%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R37156 · Foreign Corporation #37,156 · 7 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-LOW · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
- MID-PACK #37,156/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH R3—RELIABLE…
- CPC-NARROW F41C · 2 areas
- INNOV-LOW 18.0/100
- CLAIMS-PAR 9.7 claims/avg
- TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
- VEL-DROP -60% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: R3—RELIABLE Realtime Radio Communications GMBH (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Radar’s 18.0 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Radar
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Radar Leather… · this assignee 18
Radar Leather… · this assignee
18 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Radar's Innovation Score is 18.0/100 (5th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Radar?
Each dot is one of Radar’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Radar’s own 9.7 claims/patent is at or below the 10.7 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.
Where Radar's grants concentrate
Radar Leather Division S.R.L. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 2 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under F41C (Smallarms, e.g. Pistols, Rifles ; Accessories Therefor). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2017. By volume, Radar sits between R&D Dynamics Corporation and Raptor Pharmaceuticals Inc..
Who files at Radar's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- R&D Dynamics
R&D Dynamics Corporation
7 patents
- R H Sheppard
R.H. Sheppard Co. Inc.
7 patents
- R Q C
R.Q.C. Ltd.
7 patents
- R3—Reliable Realt…
R3—RELIABLE Realtime Radio Communications GMBH
7 patents
- Railway Engineeri…
Railway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy OF Railway Sciences Co., Ltd.
7 patents
- Ranplan Wireless…
Ranplan Wireless Network Design Ltd
7 patents
- Rapid AID
Rapid AID Corp.
7 patents
- Raptor Pharmaceut…
Raptor Pharmaceuticals Inc.
7 patents
- Radar Leather Div… ◀
Radar Leather Division S.R.L.
7 patents
What this shows Radar holds 7 patents at rank #37,134, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Radar
By rank, the assignees closest to #37,134 in granted patent volume.
- R&D Dynamics Corporation #37,130 · 7 patents
- R.H. Sheppard Co. Inc. #37,131 · 7 patents
- R.Q.C. Ltd. #37,132 · 7 patents
- R3—RELIABLE Realtime Radio Communications GMBH #37,133 · 7 patents
- Railway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy OF Railway Sciences Co., Ltd. #37,135 · 7 patents
- Ranplan Wireless Network Design Ltd #37,136 · 7 patents
- Rapid AID Corp. #37,137 · 7 patents
- Raptor Pharmaceuticals Inc. #37,138 · 7 patents
Leaders in F41C (Smallarms)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Radar's primary technology class.
Radar's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
18 5th percentile higher than 5% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2016 | 2 | 28.6% |
| 2017 | 1 | 14.3% |
| 2021 | 2 | 28.6% |
Which technologies does Radar Leather Division S.R.L. patent most?
Top 2 of 2 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Radar Leather Division S.R.L.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Radar Leather Division S.R.L.'s lead technology class is F41C (Smallarms, e.g. Pistols, Rifles ; Accessories Therefor), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F41C
- Ranked #37,156 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Radar Leather Division S.R.L. against R&D Dynamics Corporation, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 18.0/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.