Where does Qumulo, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Qumulo, Inc. ranks #5,625 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Qumulo, Inc. hold?

Qumulo, Inc. holds 61 US utility patents granted between 2017 and 2025, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Qumulo, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Qumulo, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 40.6 out of 100 (top 35% of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Qumulo, Inc. focus on?

Qumulo, Inc.'s top technology area is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing) with 61 patents, ranking #809 of 13,878 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

Is Qumulo, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Qumulo, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +187% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Qumulo, Inc.'s patents?

Qumulo, Inc.'s patents average 23.1 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Qumulo, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Qumulo, Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 61 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2017–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Qumulo ranks #5,625 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 61 patents across 4 technology areas.

#5,625
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: Top 35%
by Innovation Score (40.6/100): 23.1
avg claims per patent: +187%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R5625 · US Corporation #5,625 · 61 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-PAR · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-SMALL 61 grants
UPPER-Q #5,625/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Position Imaging
CPC-NARROW G06F · 4 areas
INNOV-PAR 40.6/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 23.1 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-SURGE +187% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Position Imaging, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Qumulo’s 40.6 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 14.3 pts (35%) Velocity 5.5 pts (14%) Breadth 7.1 pts (17%) Claim depth 13.8 pts (34%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Gustav Magenwirth & · near

41
NeuroNexus · near

41
Qumulo · this assignee

41
SDB IP Holdings · near

41
Toshiba Solutions · near

41
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Qumulo's Innovation Score is 40.6/100 (top 35% of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Qumulo?

Each dot is one of Qumulo’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Qumulo’s own 23.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 11.6 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Qumulo vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Qumulo's grants concentrate

Qumulo, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (13 grants) versus a trough of 2 in 2017. By volume, Qumulo sits between Pruitt Tool & Supply Co. and Samsung Heavy IND. Co., Ltd..

Qumulo's three-year grant acceleration

From 2019–2021 to 2022–2024, Qumulo, Inc. moved from 28 to 23 grants (0.82x the prior three-year total, a multiple, not a CAGR). See the growth leaderboard.

Pruitt Tool & Sup…

61
Position Imaging

61
Qingdao Ecopure F…

61
Quantumscape

61
Raytheon Canada

61
Ring Container

61
Rubbermaid Commer…

61
Samsung Heavy IND

61
Qumulo ◀

61

What this shows Qumulo holds 61 patents at rank #5,623, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Qumulo

By rank, the assignees closest to #5,623 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Qumulo's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Qumulo, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), Qumulo ranks #809 of 13,878 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (41 here).

SDB IP Holdings, LLC 41 Toshiba Solutions Corporation 41 NeuroNexus Technologies, Inc. 41 Gustav Magenwirth GmbH & Co. 41

Similar claim depth

Nearest assignees by average claims per patent (23.1 here).

Pensando Systems Inc. 23.1 avg Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd. 23.1 avg Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. 23.1 avg Cymer, LLC 23.1 avg

Qumulo's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

41 Top 35% higher than 65% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2017–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2017–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Qumulo, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2017	2	3.3%
2018	5	8.2%
2019	8	13.1%
2020	13	21.3%
2021	7	11.5%
2022	11	18.0%
2023	7	11.5%
2024	5	8.2%
2025partial year	3	4.9%

Which technologies does Qumulo, Inc. patent most?

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 61

H04L - Transmission OF Digital Information, e.g. Telegraphic Communication 8

H03M - CODING; DECODING; Code Conversion IN General 1

G06N - Computing Arrangements Based ON Specific Computational Models 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Qumulo, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Qumulo, Inc.'s lead technology class is G06F (Electric Digital Data Processing), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G06F
Ranked #5,625 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Qumulo, Inc. against Pruitt Tool & Supply Co., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 40.6/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent, US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.