Where does Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. ranks #42,520 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. hold?

Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2021, spanning 4 technology areas.

What is Qiagen Redwood City, Inc.'s Innovation Score?

Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. has an Innovation Score of 28.8 out of 100 (28th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

Is Qiagen Redwood City, Inc.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Qiagen Redwood City, Inc.'s recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Qiagen Redwood City, Inc.'s patents?

Qiagen Redwood City, Inc.'s patents average 29.7 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Qiagen Redwood City, Inc.

Q: What technology areas does Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. focus on?

Qiagen Redwood City, Inc.'s top technology area is G16B (Bioinformatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Genetic OR Protein-related Data Processing IN Computational Molecular Biology) with 6 patents, ranking #116 of 676 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 4 CPC subclasses total.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 4 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: G16B (Bioinformatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Genetic OR Protein-related Data Processing IN Computational Molecular Biology).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Qiagen ranks #42,520 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 4 technology areas.

#42,520
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 28th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.8/100): 29.7
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R42520 · US Corporation #42,520 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #42,520/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH QED Labs
CPC-NARROW G16B · 4 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.8/100
CLAIMS-DENSE 29.7 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: QED Labs, Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Qiagen’s 28.8 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (23%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 7.1 pts (25%) Claim depth 15.0 pts (52%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Qiagen Redwood City · this assignee

29
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Qiagen's Innovation Score is 28.8/100 (28th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Qiagen?

Each dot is one of Qiagen’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Qiagen’s own 29.7 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.0 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Qiagen vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Qiagen's grants concentrate

Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 4 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under G16B (Bioinformatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Genetic OR Protein-related Data Processing IN Computational Molecular Biology). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Qiagen sits between QED Labs, Inc. and Qingdao Haier Special Refrigeration Electric Appliance Co., Ltd..

QED Labs

6
QGP

6
Qiagen Healthcare…

6
Qiagen Manchester

6
Qianjiang Yongan…

6
Qiduo E-commerce…

6
Qierling (Beijing…

6
Qingdao Haier Spe…

6
Qiagen Redwood Ci… ◀

6

What this shows Qiagen holds 6 patents at rank #42,490, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Qiagen

By rank, the assignees closest to #42,490 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in G16B (Bioinformatics)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Qiagen's primary technology class.

Qiagen's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

29 28th percentile higher than 28% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	1	16.7%
2019	2	33.3%
2020	2	33.3%
2021	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. patent most?

G16B - Bioinformatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Genetic OR Protein-related Data Processing IN Computational Molecular Biology 6

G06F - Electric Digital Data Processing 2

G16H - Healthcare Informatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR THE Handling OR Processing OF Medical OR Healthcare Data 1

G16C - Computational CHEMISTRY; CHEMOINFORMATICS; Computational Materials Science 1

Top 4 of 4 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Qiagen Redwood City, Inc.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Qiagen Redwood City, Inc.'s lead technology class is G16B (Bioinformatics, i.e. Information AND Communication Technology [ICT] Specially Adapted FOR Genetic OR Protein-related Data Processing IN Computational Molecular Biology), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore G16B
Ranked #42,520 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Qiagen Redwood City, Inc. against QED Labs, Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.8/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.