USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Q3 Medical Devices Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 25 granted patents across 10 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2025. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Q3 ranks #12,181 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 25 patents across 10 technology areas.

#12,181
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
44th percentile
by Innovation Score (33.4/100)
15.1
avg claims per patent
+40%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R12181 · Foreign Corporation #12,181 · 25 grants

GRANTS-SMALL · UPPER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-UP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-SMALL 25 grants
  • UPPER-Q #12,181/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Princeton Identity
  • CPC-FOCUS A61F · 10 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 33.4/100
  • CLAIMS-RICH 15.1 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-UP +40% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Princeton Identity (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Q3’s 33.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Q3

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Q3's Innovation Score is 33.4/100 (44th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Q3?

Each dot is one of Q3’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Q3’s own 15.1 claims/patent is ABOVE the 10.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Q3 vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 24.924.92525.1 0510152025 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent Princeton Identity - 25, 22.92Princeton IdentityPrinceton Technology Corporation - 25, 10.32Princeton Technol…Prospira Corporation - 25, 9.92ProspiraPwC Product Sales LLC - 25, 22.64Pwc Product SalesQuipip, LLC - 25, 12.04QuipipQfix Systems, LLC - 25, 18.16Qfix SystemsQuip NYC Inc. - 25, 3.28Quip NYCR.Y.L. Inc. - 25, 3.6R Y LQ3 Medical Devices Limited - 25, 15.12Q3 Medical Devices
Q3 vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Q3's grants concentrate

Q3 Medical Devices Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 10 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2015. By volume, Q3 sits between Princeton Identity and R.Y.L. Inc..

Q3's three-year grant acceleration

Q3 Medical Devices Limited shows 4 grants in 2022–2024 against only 14 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Who files at Q3's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Q3 holds 25 patents at rank #12,178, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Q3

By rank, the assignees closest to #12,178 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Q3's primary technology class.

Assignees with similar portfolio profiles

Two PlainPatent-derived peer sets for Q3, neither rank-band nor same-CPC leaders (those blocks stay above). In A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood Vessels), Q3 ranks #260 of 3,082 assignees by patent count in that subclass.

Similar innovation score

Nearest assignees by Innovation Score (33 here).

Q3's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 44th percentile higher than 44% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0123456 20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2025

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Q3 Medical Devices Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 1 4.0%
2016 3 12.0%
2017 1 4.0%
2018 1 4.0%
2019 4 16.0%
2020 5 20.0%
2021 5 20.0%
2022 1 4.0%
2023 1 4.0%
2024 2 8.0%
2025partial year 1 4.0%

Which technologies does Q3 Medical Devices Limited patent most?

Top 10 of 10 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Q3 Medical Devices Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Q3 Medical Devices Limited's lead technology class is A61F (Filters Implantable Into Blood VESSELS; PROSTHESES; Devices Providing Patency TO, OR Preventing Collapsing OF, Tubular Structures OF THE Body, e.g. STENTS; Orthopaedic, Nursing OR Contraceptive Device), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61F
  • Ranked #12,181 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Q3 Medical Devices Limited against Princeton Identity, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 33.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.