Where does Q-bot Limited rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Q-bot Limited ranks #37,114 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Q-bot Limited hold?

Q-bot Limited holds 7 US utility patents granted between 2019 and 2021, spanning 11 technology areas.

What is Q-bot Limited's Innovation Score?

Q-bot Limited has an Innovation Score of 28.2 out of 100 (26th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Q-bot Limited focus on?

Q-bot Limited's top technology area is B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles) with 6 patents, ranking #219 of 1,384 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 11 CPC subclasses total.

Is Q-bot Limited's patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Q-bot Limited's recent grant velocity is +500% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). This indicates accelerating grant output.

What does claim depth mean for Q-bot Limited's patents?

Q-bot Limited's patents average 15.4 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Q-bot Limited patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Q-bot Limited

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 7 granted patents across 11 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2019–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Q-bot ranks #37,114 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 7 patents across 11 technology areas.

#37,114
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 26th percentile
by Innovation Score (28.2/100): 15.4
avg claims per patent: +500%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R37114 · Foreign Corporation #37,114 · 7 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-FOCUS · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-SURGE · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 7 grants
MID-PACK #37,114/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Purewine
CPC-FOCUS B05B · 11 areas
INNOV-THIN 28.2/100
CLAIMS-RICH 15.4 claims/avg
TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
VEL-SURGE +500% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Purewine Inc. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Q-bot’s 28.2 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 7.2 pts (26%) Velocity 0.0 pts (0%) Breadth 11.7 pts (41%) Claim depth 9.3 pts (33%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Q-bot · this assignee

28
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Q-bot's Innovation Score is 28.2/100 (26th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Q-bot?

Each dot is one of Q-bot’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Q-bot’s own 15.4 claims/patent is at or below the 17.3 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Q-bot vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Q-bot's grants concentrate

Q-bot Limited is a focused PatentsView assignee: 11 CPC subclasses with 85.7% of grants classified under B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles). Peak complete grant year is 2020 (3 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2019. By volume, Q-bot sits between Purewine Inc. and Qiagen Waltham, Inc..

Purewine

7
Purple Line

7
Pursuit Vascular

7
Pyramid Computer

7
Q-med AB

7
Q-net Security

7
Qed-it Systems

7
Qiagen Waltham

7
Q-bot ◀

7

What this shows Q-bot holds 7 patents at rank #37,090, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Q-bot

By rank, the assignees closest to #37,090 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B05B (Spraying Apparatus)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Q-bot's primary technology class.

Q-bot's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

28 26th percentile higher than 26% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2019–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2019–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Q-bot Limited patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2019	1	14.3%
2020	3	42.9%
2021	3	42.9%

Which technologies does Q-bot Limited patent most?

B05B - Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles 6

B25J - MANIPULATORS; Chambers Provided With Manipulation Devices 6

Y10S - Technical Subjects Covered BY Former Uspc Cross-reference ART Collections [XRACs] AND Digests 3

E04F - Finishing Work ON Buildings, e.g. Stairs, Floors 3

E04B - General Building CONSTRUCTIONS; Walls, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; Insulation OR Other Protection OF Buildings 3

G05D - Systems FOR Controlling OR Regulating Non-electric Variables 2

B05D - Processes FOR Applying Fluent Materials TO Surfaces, IN General 2

B62D - Motor VEHICLES; Trailers 1

G01B - Measuring Length, Thickness OR Similar Linear DIMENSIONS; Measuring ANGLES; Measuring AREAS; Measuring Irregularities OF Surfaces OR Contours 1

G01C - Measuring Distances, Levels OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; Gyroscopic INSTRUMENTS; Photogrammetry OR Videogrammetry 1

G06T - Image Data Processing OR Generation, IN General 1

Top 11 of 11 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Q-bot Limited's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Q-bot Limited's lead technology class is B05B (Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles), 85.7% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B05B
Ranked #37,114 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Q-bot Limited against Purewine Inc., an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 28.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.