PlainPatent
USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 11 granted patents across 5 technology areas, active 2016–2019. Filing-trend and competitive-moat analysis cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search. Primary class: A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY).

Explore the portfolio See the ranking
11
Total patents granted
5
CPC technology areas
15.3
Avg claims per patent
-100%
5-year filing velocity

The verdict

Pyramid holds 11 US patents across 5 technology areas, rank #25,028 of 50,000 tracked assignees.

#25,028
of 50,000 US assignees by volume
Top 82%
by Innovation Score (25.6/100)
15.3
avg claims per patent
-100%
filing velocity, last 5 yrs

Portfolio overview

Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. has been granted 11 US utility patents between 2016 and 2019, placing Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. at rank #25,028 across all assignees tracked by PlainPatent. This portfolio spans 5 distinct Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) subclasses, averaging 15.3 claims per patent with primary concentration in A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY). As a US Corporation, Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. is one of the more focused assignees in the PatentsView dataset. By volume, Pyramid sits between Public Joint Stock Company “sibur Holding” (11 patents, rank #25,024) and Qorvo International PTE. Ltd. (11 patents, rank #25,032) - the closest US assignees by grant volume. The composite Innovation Score of 25.6/100 blends portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth into a single comparable measure drawn directly from USPTO PatentsView records.

Filing cadence tells the strategic story. Between 2020 and 2025 the company received 0 grants, compared with 11 in the 2015–2019 window, a -100% shift in five-year velocity. A cooling filing rate may reflect portfolio consolidation, shifting priorities, or reduced R&D throughput. The US Corporation classification further shapes interpretation, since corporate, government, and individual filers pursue patents for materially different reasons.

Claim depth and technology breadth together indicate competitive posture. Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc.'s 15.3 average claims per patent sits within the typical range for solid legal coverage without excessive prosecution cost, while concentration in 5 subclasses points to a focused technical program. Combined with portfolio volume, these signals let analysts, investors, and licensing professionals benchmark Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. against peers pursuing similar technology classes.

Who files at Pyramid's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Pyramid holds 11 patents at rank #25,028, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Pyramid's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, filing velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

26 Top 82% higher than 18% of 50,000 US assignees

0–10: 687 US assignees (1%). Below this entry. 10–20: 2,527 US assignees (5%). Below this entry. 20–30: 13,162 US assignees (26%). This entry sits in this band. 30–40: 15,294 US assignees (31%). Above this entry. 40–50: 11,491 US assignees (23%). Above this entry. 50–60: 5,058 US assignees (10%). Above this entry. 60–70: 1,537 US assignees (3%). Above this entry. 70–80: 234 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 80–90: 10 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. 90–100: 0 US assignees (0%). Above this entry. This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

012345 2016201720182019 4
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2016–2019

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2016 3 27.3%
2017 1 9.1%
2018 3 27.3%
2019 4 36.4%

Which technologies does Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. patent most?

Top 5 of 5 technology areas

Patent Moat Analysis

Portfolio Volume Light
Tech Breadth Focused
Claim Depth Standard
Velocity Declining

Where it ranks

Overall rank by patents

#25,028

Across all tracked assignees

Innovation Score

25.6 out of 100

View all rankings →

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

How is Innovation Score calculated?

Frequently Asked Questions

How many patents does Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. hold?
Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. holds 11 US granted patents filed between 2016 and 2019, spanning 5 technology areas.
What is Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc.'s Innovation Score?
Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. has an Innovation Score of 25.6 out of 100. This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), filing velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).
What technology areas does Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. focus on?
Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc.'s top technology area is A61N (ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY) with 11 patents. The company has filed patents in 5 CPC subclasses total.
Is Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc.'s patent filing rate increasing or decreasing?
Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc.'s recent filing velocity is -100% compared to the prior five-year period. Filing activity has slowed relative to earlier years.
What does claim depth mean for Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc.'s patents?
Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc.'s patents average 15.3 claims each. This falls within the standard range, providing solid legal coverage.
How is the Pyramid Technical Consultants Inc. patent data sourced?
All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

How to use this portfolio

Pyramid's 11 grants land it in the top 82% by Innovation Score, but volume alone doesn't tell you where the strength sits.

  • Read that count against the largest US assignees before treating it as dominance - Pyramid ranks #25,028 of 50,000. Top 50 holders
  • Most of this portfolio concentrates in A61N - see who else leads that technology area. A61N leaders
  • Check what the four-part Innovation Score actually rewards before comparing it to another company. How the score works

Patent counts and the Innovation Score measure patenting activity, not commercial success or the legal strength of any patent. Many patents are filed defensively. Verify the status of an individual patent against official USPTO records.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent Editorial

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page
  • USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
  • Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
  • USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error.