Progreen Labs, LLC
USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 8 granted patents across 7 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2016–2018. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: F23N (Regulating OR Controlling Combustion).
The verdict
According to USPTO PatentsView, Progreen ranks #32,945 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 8 patents across 7 technology areas.
- #32,945
- of 49,997 US assignees by volume
- 26th percentile
- by Innovation Score (28.2/100)
- 18.8
- avg claims per patent
- -100%
- grant velocity, last 5 yrs
USPTO PatentsView assignee plate
Corpus R32945 · US Corporation #32,945 · 8 grants
GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-RICH · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL
- GRANTS-MICRO 8 grants
- MID-PACK #32,945/49,997
- PHOTO-FINISH Prime Focus
- CPC-NARROW F23N · 7 areas
- INNOV-THIN 28.2/100
- CLAIMS-RICH 18.8 claims/avg
- TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
- VEL-DROP -100% vel
- BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields
Nearest grant-volume peer: Prime Focus Technologies Limited (±0 grants)
Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.
How Progreen’s 28.2 Innovation Score adds up
The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.
Innovation-score neighbourhood around Progreen
Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.
- Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
Qualcomm Incorporated · highest
85 score
- Progreen Labs · this assignee 28
Progreen Labs · this assignee
28 score
- 3D Lighting… · lowest 7
3D Lighting… · lowest
7 score
What this shows Progreen's Innovation Score is 28.2/100 (26th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.
Does more volume mean deeper claims for Progreen?
Each dot is one of Progreen’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Progreen’s own 18.8 claims/patent is ABOVE the 8.3 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.
Where Progreen's grants concentrate
Progreen Labs, LLC is a focused PatentsView assignee: 7 CPC subclasses with 100% of grants classified under F23N (Regulating OR Controlling Combustion). Peak complete grant year is 2018 (5 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2016. By volume, Progreen sits between Prime Focus Technologies Limited and Proteometech Inc..
Who files at Progreen's volume?
Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀
- Prime Focus
Prime Focus Technologies Limited
8 patents
- PRO Medicare S R L
PRO Medicare S.R.L.
8 patents
- Proceq
Proceq AG
8 patents
- Professional Diet…
Professional Dietetics S.P.A.
8 patents
- Promedica Health…
Promedica Health System, Inc.
8 patents
- Promontech
Promontech LLC
8 patents
- Propella Therapeu…
Propella Therapeutics, Inc.
8 patents
- Proteometech
Proteometech Inc.
8 patents
- Progreen Labs ◀
Progreen Labs, LLC
8 patents
What this shows Progreen holds 8 patents at rank #32,847, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.
Companies ranked near Progreen
By rank, the assignees closest to #32,847 in granted patent volume.
- Prime Focus Technologies Limited #32,843 · 8 patents
- PRO Medicare S.R.L. #32,844 · 8 patents
- Proceq AG #32,845 · 8 patents
- Professional Dietetics S.P.A. #32,846 · 8 patents
- Promedica Health System, Inc. #32,848 · 8 patents
- Promontech LLC #32,849 · 8 patents
- Propella Therapeutics, Inc. #32,850 · 8 patents
- Proteometech Inc. #32,851 · 8 patents
Leaders in F23N (Regulating OR Controlling Combustion)
Other assignees with the most granted patents in Progreen's primary technology class.
- Clearsign Combustion Corporation 40 in class
- Haier US Appliance Solutions, Inc. 38 in class
- Emerson Electric Co. 26 in class
- Midea Group Co., Ltd. 23 in class
- Rheem Manufacturing Company 23 in class
- Kyungdong Navien Co., Ltd. 20 in class
- Rinnai Corporation 20 in class
- Grand Mate Co., Ltd. 20 in class
Progreen's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee
Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)
28 26th percentile higher than 26% of 49,997 US assignees
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025
Grants by year
Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2016–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.
View data table
| Year | Patents Granted | Share of Period |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 | 12.5% |
| 2017 | 2 | 25.0% |
| 2018 | 5 | 62.5% |
Which technologies does Progreen Labs, LLC patent most?
Top 7 of 7 technology areas
Data Source
USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025
What to do with this data
Progreen Labs, LLC's patent record in context - here's where to go next.
- Progreen Labs, LLC's lead technology class is F23N (Regulating OR Controlling Combustion), 100% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore F23N
- Ranked #32,945 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
- Compare Progreen Labs, LLC against Prime Focus Technologies Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
- Innovation Score of 28.2/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated
Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.
Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.