Where does Production Plus Corp. rank among US patent assignees?

According to USPTO PatentsView (2015–2025 granted utility patents), Production Plus Corp. ranks #42,453 of 49,997 assignees by granted-patent volume, the same sort as the companies listing and top-holders ranking. See /methodology/#corpus-placement.

How many patents does Production Plus Corp. hold?

Production Plus Corp. holds 6 US utility patents granted between 2018 and 2023, spanning 6 technology areas.

What is Production Plus Corp.'s Innovation Score?

Production Plus Corp. has an Innovation Score of 22.4 out of 100 (10th percentile of the corpus). This composite metric weighs portfolio volume (40%), grant velocity (20%), technology breadth (25%), and claim depth (15%).

What technology areas does Production Plus Corp. focus on?

Production Plus Corp.'s top technology area is B08B (Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General) with 2 patents, ranking #317 of 1,035 assignees active in that subclass. Grants appear in 6 CPC subclasses total.

Is Production Plus Corp.'s patent grant rate increasing or decreasing?

Production Plus Corp.'s recent grant velocity is +0% compared to the prior five-year period (grant years, not application filing dates). The company is maintaining or growing its granted-patent output.

What does claim depth mean for Production Plus Corp.'s patents?

Production Plus Corp.'s patents average 9.0 claims each. This is an aggregate descriptive count from the grant record; it does not establish claim scope, legal strength, enforceability, or design-around risk.

How is the Production Plus Corp. patent data sourced?

All patent data comes from USPTO PatentsView, a public research dataset maintained by the United States Patent and Trademark Office covering US granted utility patents from 2015 to 2025.

USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView US Corporation

Production Plus Corp.

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 6 granted patents across 6 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2018–2023. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: B08B (Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General).

Compiled by PlainPatent · May 15, 2026

RSS updates for this company

Explore the portfolio See the ranking

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Production ranks #42,453 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 6 patents across 6 technology areas.

#42,453
of 49,997 US assignees by volume: 10th percentile
by Innovation Score (22.4/100): 9.0
avg claims per patent: +0%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R42453 · US Corporation #42,453 · 6 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · LOWER-Q · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-PAR · TYPE-USCORP · VEL-FLAT · BOOK-FULL

GRANTS-MICRO 6 grants
LOWER-Q #42,453/49,997
PHOTO-FINISH Process
CPC-NARROW B08B · 6 areas
INNOV-THIN 22.4/100
CLAIMS-PAR 9.0 claims/avg
TYPE-USCORP US Corporation
VEL-FLAT +0% vel
BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Process Limited (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Production’s 22.4 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Volume 6.7 pts (30%) Velocity 1.7 pts (8%) Breadth 8.7 pts (39%) Claim depth 5.4 pts (24%)

Qualcomm Incorporated · highest

85
Production Plus · this assignee

22
3D Lighting… · lowest

7

What this shows Production's Innovation Score is 22.4/100 (10th percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Production?

Each dot is one of Production’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Production’s own 9.0 claims/patent is at or below the 14.0 median for these volume peers. Volume here does not track with deeper claims; several lower-volume peers claim more thoroughly per patent.

Production vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Production's grants concentrate

Production Plus Corp. is a focused PatentsView assignee: 6 CPC subclasses with 33.3% of grants classified under B08B (Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General). Peak complete grant year is 2019 (2 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2018. By volume, Production sits between Process Limited and Prokarium Limited.

Production's three-year grant acceleration

Production Plus Corp. shows 1 grants in 2022–2024 against only 4 in 2019–2021. That prior window is too thin for a growth multiple (rename and spin-out assignees look artificially high when the baseline is near zero), so PlainPatent withholds a ranked acceleration claim here.

Process

6
Process Metrix

6
Processchamp

6
Procon Analytics

6
Profense

6
Progastrine et Ca…

6
Progressive Neuro

6
Prokarium

6
Production Plus ◀

6

What this shows Production holds 6 patents at rank #42,455, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Companies ranked near Production

By rank, the assignees closest to #42,455 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in B08B (Cleaning IN General)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Production's primary technology class.

Production's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

22 10th percentile higher than 10% of 49,997 US assignees

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2018–2023

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2018–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table

Production Plus Corp. patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year	Patents Granted	Share of Period
2018	1	16.7%
2019	2	33.3%
2021	2	33.3%
2023	1	16.7%

Which technologies does Production Plus Corp. patent most?

B08B - Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General 2

B44D - Painting OR Artistic Drawing, NOT Otherwise Provided FOR; Preserving PAINTINGS; Surface Treatment TO Obtain Special Artistic Surface Effects OR Finishes 2

B05B - Spraying APPARATUS; Atomising APPARATUS; Nozzles 1

B21D - Working OR Processing OF Sheet Metal OR Metal Tubes, Rods OR Profiles Without Essentially Removing MATERIAL; Punching Metal 1

B05C - Apparatus FOR Applying Fluent Materials TO Surfaces, IN General 1

C25D - Processes FOR THE Electrolytic OR Electrophoretic Production OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; Apparatus Therefor 1

Top 6 of 6 technology areas

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

View all rankings → How is Innovation Score calculated?

What to do with this data

Production Plus Corp.'s patent record in context - here's where to go next.

Production Plus Corp.'s lead technology class is B08B (Cleaning IN GENERAL; Prevention OF Fouling IN General), 33.3% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore B08B
Ranked #42,453 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
Compare Production Plus Corp. against Process Limited, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
Innovation Score of 22.4/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Data sourced from USPTO PatentsView - official U.S. government patent data. See our methodology for computation details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainPatent

Disclaimer: This information is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute professional advice. Data is sourced from the USPTO PatentsView database. Consult a qualified professional before making decisions based on this data.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sources used on this page

USPTO PatentsView - the disambiguated bulk patent-grant, assignee, and CPC data this page's figures are derived from. patentsview.org
Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC) - the joint USPTO/EPO classification scheme used to group patents by technology area. cooperativepatentclassification.org
USPTO Patent Public Search - the official interface to verify the status of any individual patent. ppubs.uspto.gov

Compiled by PlainPatent , US Patent Intelligence Editorial Process · May 15, 2026

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.