USPTO 2015–2025 USPTO PatentsView Foreign Corporation

Probiodrug AG

USPTO PatentsView assignee record - 19 granted patents across 8 technology areas, recorded in grant years 2015–2021. Grant-trend analysis is cross-referenced to USPTO Patent Public Search; it does not measure application filings, current R&D, or legal strength. Primary class: A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations).

RSS updates for this company

The verdict

According to USPTO PatentsView, Probiodrug ranks #15,551 of 49,997 tracked US assignees by granted-patent volume, with 19 patents across 8 technology areas.

#15,551
of 49,997 US assignees by volume
42nd percentile
by Innovation Score (32.7/100)
20.5
avg claims per patent
-88%
grant velocity, last 5 yrs

USPTO PatentsView assignee plate

Corpus R15551 · Foreign Corporation #15,551 · 19 grants

GRANTS-MICRO · MID-PACK · PHOTO-FINISH · CPC-NARROW · INNOV-THIN · CLAIMS-DENSE · TYPE-FRNCORP · VEL-DROP · BOOK-FULL

  • GRANTS-MICRO 19 grants
  • MID-PACK #15,551/49,997
  • PHOTO-FINISH Paradigm Sciences
  • CPC-NARROW A61P · 8 areas
  • INNOV-THIN 32.7/100
  • CLAIMS-DENSE 20.5 claims/avg
  • TYPE-FRNCORP Foreign Corp
  • VEL-DROP -88% vel
  • BOOK-FULL 10/10 fields

Nearest grant-volume peer: Paradigm Sciences Ltd. (±0 grants)

Instrument codes from this assignee’s USPTO PatentsView grant sheet: volume band, corpus rank, photo-finish peer, lead CPC, Innovation Score, claim depth, assignee type, velocity, and book completeness. Not a USPTO rating of patent strength.

How Probiodrug’s 32.7 Innovation Score adds up

The same four weighted components behind every Innovation Score on PlainPatent: portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth.

Innovation-score neighbourhood around Probiodrug

Lowest and highest poles plus nearest Innovation Score peers, not a full corpus board reprint.

score

What this shows Probiodrug's Innovation Score is 32.7/100 (42nd percentile of the PatentsView-derived corpus). The chart places that score against the nearest Innovation Score peers plus corpus poles, not a reprint of the volume ranking.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score As of 2015–2025

Does more volume mean deeper claims for Probiodrug?

Each dot is one of Probiodrug’s 8 nearest volume peers (same corpus rank neighbourhood as the chart above), placed by total granted patents (horizontal) against average claims per patent (vertical). Probiodrug’s own 20.5 claims/patent is ABOVE the 15.5 median for these volume peers. More thorough claims than most filers at this scale, not just more of them.

Probiodrug vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView. 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 9 entities by Granted patents (volume) (X) and Avg claims / patent (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Volume + depthSelective & thoroughVolume over depthLean filer 18.918.91919.1 51015202530 Granted patents (volume) Avg claims / patent PQSecure Technologies, LLC - 19, 11.84PqsecurePreco, LLC - 19, 15.53PrecoPreferred Technology, LLC - 19, 17.05Preferred Technol…Premark FEG L.L.C. - 19, 11.26Premark FEG L L CProdrone Co., Ltd. - 19, 8.89ProdroneProgenity, Inc. - 19, 24.37ProgenityProse Technologies LLC - 19, 15.47ProseParadigm Sciences Ltd. - 19, 22Paradigm SciencesProbiodrug AG - 19, 20.53Probiodrug
Probiodrug vs its 8 nearest volume peers: granted patents vs average claims per patent. Source: USPTO PatentsView.

Where Probiodrug's grants concentrate

Probiodrug AG is a focused PatentsView assignee: 8 CPC subclasses with 84.2% of grants classified under A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations). Peak complete grant year is 2015 (8 grants) versus a trough of 1 in 2020. By volume, Probiodrug sits between PQSecure Technologies, LLC and Paradigm Sciences Ltd..

Who files at Probiodrug's volume?

Granted US patents 2015–2025 versus its nearest-ranked assignees by volume, this company marked ◀

patents

What this shows Probiodrug holds 19 patents at rank #15,533, shown against the 8 assignees closest to it in grant volume rather than the industry's largest filers.

Source USPTO PatentsView, granted utility patents As of 2015–2025

Companies ranked near Probiodrug

By rank, the assignees closest to #15,533 in granted patent volume.

Leaders in A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Me…)

Other assignees with the most granted patents in Probiodrug's primary technology class.

Probiodrug's Innovation Score vs. every tracked assignee

Composite of portfolio volume, grant velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth (0–100)

33 42nd percentile higher than 42% of 49,997 US assignees

This assignee 0 100 every tracked assignee, bucketed by value

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US assignees. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source USPTO PatentsView, PlainPatent Innovation Score · 2015–2025

0246810 20152016201720202021 1
USPTO utility patent grants by year · 2015–2021

Grants by year

Teal-shaded recent years (2020–present) versus the 2015–2019 baseline. Full figures in the table below.

View data table
Probiodrug AG patent grants by year, 2015–2025
Year Patents Granted Share of Period
2015 8 42.1%
2016 4 21.1%
2017 5 26.3%
2020 1 5.3%
2021 1 5.3%

More on this record

Data Source

USPTO PatentsView, US granted patents 2015–2025

What to do with this data

Probiodrug AG's patent record in context - here's where to go next.

  • Probiodrug AG's lead technology class is A61P (Specific Therapeutic Activity OF Chemical Compounds OR Medicinal Preparations), 84.2% of its portfolio - see every assignee active in that class. Explore A61P
  • Ranked #15,551 of 49,997 tracked assignees by patent volume - see the full leaderboard. See the ranking
  • Compare Probiodrug AG against PQSecure Technologies, LLC, an assignee filing at a similar volume. Compare portfolios
  • Innovation Score of 32.7/100 blends volume, velocity, technology breadth, and claim depth. How it's calculated

Figures reflect USPTO PatentsView grant data through May 2026; pending applications not yet granted are not counted.

Every figure on PlainPatent is rendered directly from USPTO source data, no number is typed in by an editor. This page draws directly on USPTO source data, no figure is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of May 2026.